Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thomas Kj vs The Authorised Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 10849 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10849 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2022

Kerala High Court
Thomas Kj vs The Authorised Officer on 2 November, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
  WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1944
                       WP(C) NO. 26838 OF 2022

PETITIONERS:

    1     THOMAS KJ
          AGED 48 YEARS
          KADAMKERY HOUSE, JR APARTMENTS,
          NORTH KALAMASSERY, THRIKKAKARA NORTH(PART),
          KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 104.


    2     JIKSY THOMAS
          AGED 47 YEARS,W/O THOMAS K.J.,
          AGED 47 YEARS, KADAMKERY HOUSE,
          JR APARTMENTS, NORTH KALAMASSERY,
          THRIKKAKARA NORTH (PART), KALAMASSERY,
          ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683 104.


          BY ADVS.
                     S.ABHILASH VISHNU
                     K.R.MONISHA


RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE AUTHORISED OFFICER
          SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,
          REGIONAL OFFICE,KOCHI - 682 039.

    2     THE MANAGER SOUTH INDIAN BANK
          SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,KALAMASSERY BRANCH,
          PIN - 683 104.


          BY ADVS.
                      SUNIL SHANKAR A
                      VIDYA GANGADHARAN(K/000424/2020)
                      SANDHRA.S(K/001610/2021)


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
02.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.26838 of 2022
                                       -:2:-

                           JUDGMENT

Petitioners have approached this Court challenging

proceedings initiated under the Securitisation and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of

Security Interest Act (SARFAESI Act) for recovery of the

amounts due under a housing loan availed by the

petitioners.

2. During the course of hearing, petitioners have

confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the

overdue amount in installments and to obtain regularization

of the loan account.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent

Bank states that the overdue amount after giving credit to

the amounts paid under the interim order of this Court is

Rs.5,60,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Sixty Thousand Only) as

on 27-10-2022. It was further submitted that though

proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a matter of

indulgence, the respondent bank is willing to accept

repayment of the overdue amount in limited installments

and regularize the loan account.

W.P.(C) No.26838 of 2022

4. I have heard Adv.S.Abhilash Vishnu, learned

counsel for the petitioners as well as Adv.Sunil Shankar.A,

the learned counsel for the respondents.

5. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and

the situation now prevailing, apart from the submissions

made as recorded above, I am of the view that the

petitioners can be granted an opportunity to repay the

overdue amount in five (05) installments and thereafter, if

the amount so directed is repaid within the time as directed

above, to have the loan account regularized.

6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue

amount of Rs.5,60,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Sixty Thousand

Only) along with bank charges from the petitioners and

regularize the loan account of the petitioners on the

following conditions:

(i) The overdue amount of Rs.5,60,000/- (Rupees Five

Lakhs Sixty Thousand Only) together with any accrued

interest and costs shall be repaid in five (05) equated

monthly installments.

W.P.(C) No.26838 of 2022

(ii) The first installment shall be paid on or before

07-11-2022. The subsequent installments shall be paid on

or before the 7th day of the succeeding months.

(iii) Petitioners shall continue to pay the regular EMI's

along with the installments as directed above.

(iv) In the event of default of any one installment, the

respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance

with law.

(v) In order to enable the petitioners to repay the

entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in

abeyance.

The possession of the secured asset will be handed

over to the petitioner only after the entire overdue amount

is paid by the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDGE ats W.P.(C) No.26838 of 2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26838/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS DATED 01.08.2022

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS

EXT.R2(a) True copy of the sale notice dated 26.08.2022

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter