Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27394 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:46371
CRL.P No. 6398 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6398 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
1. THE GATHIC ZOROASTRIAN ANJUMAN BANGALORE
A REGISTERED TRUST
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
NO.28-6, PARSEE CEMETERY
11TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM
VYALIKAVAL
BANGALORE - 560003
BY ITS PRESIDENT
AIR VICE MARSHAL (RETD.)
RAMYAR BATHA
Digitally signed
by NAGAVENI AGE 71, SUNNY SIDE,
Location: HIGH NO.32, RUSTUM BAGH,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA HAL AIRPORT ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560017
2. AIR VICE MARSHAL (RETD.) RAMYAR BATHA
SON OF LATE K A BATHA
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
R/AT NO.71, "SUNNY SIDE"
NO.32, RUSTUM BAGH
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:46371
CRL.P No. 6398 of 2020
HAL AIRPORT ROAD
BANGALORE - 560017
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. JOSHUA HUDSON SAMUEL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY VYALIKAVAL POLICE
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
2. MR. GOPAL
SON OF LATE MUNIBELLAPPA MAJOR
GARDNER / CARETAKER
IN THE PARSEE CEMETRY
11TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM
VYALIKAVAL
BANGALORE - 560003
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1;
SRI. ARAVIND BABU, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH /
SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.11.2019 PASSED BY
THE LEARNED VIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.16531/2017
CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FOR RECALLING THE PW1
TO PW3.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:46371
CRL.P No. 6398 of 2020
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel Sri.Joshua Hudson Samuel,
appearing for the petitioners and the learned Addl. S.P.P.,
Sri.B.N.Jagadeesha, appearing for respondent No.1.
2. Learned counsel Sri.Aravind Babu, representing the
second respondent would submit that the concerned Court has
passed an order of acquittal in favour of the second respondent
by its judgment dated 13.11.2024 and he has filed a memo to
that effect.
3. In that light, the subject petition is rendered
infructuous and is disposed as having become infructuous and
the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the order of the
concerned Court acquitting the second respondent in a manner
known to law.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!