Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1506 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:1031
RSA No. 100112 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100112/2021(SP)
BETWEEN:
DUDUSAB LADASAB MULLA,
AGE: 61 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: BARADWADA,
KUNDGOL TALUK,
DIST: DHARWAD - 580 001.
- APPELLANT
(BY SRI SANTOSH D. NARAGUND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
IBRAHIMSAB LADASAB MULLA,
AGE: 57 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: BARADWADA,
KUNDGOL TALUK,
DIST: DHARWAD - 580 001.
Digitally - RESPONDENT
signed by (BY SRI PRASHANT S. HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE)
VINAYAKA
BV THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED U/SEC.100 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.03.2021 PASSED
IN R.A.NO.3/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, KUNDGOL, ALLOWING THE
APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DTD.30.11.2019, PASSED IN O.S. NO.82/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE
CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, KUNDGOL,
DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE & ETC.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL, COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:1031
RSA No. 100112 of 2021
JUDGMENT
This regular second appeal is filed by the defendant in
O.S. No. 82/2016 on the file of the Civil Judge & JMFC, Kundgol
challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Senior Civil
Judge & JMFC, Kundgol (first appellate court) in R.A. No.
3/2020 by which it allowed the appeal and set aside the
judgment and decree passed by the trial court and decreed the
suit for specific performance.
2. When this case was listed for admission, the learned
counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the
respondent have filed a joint memo which reads as follows:
"The appellant and respondent respectfully submits as under:
1. That the appellant has challenged the Judgment and Decree of R.A. No. 3/2020 dated 24/3/2021 passed by the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Kundgol, modifying the judgment and decree of trial courts judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 82/2016, dated 30/11/2019 passed by the Hon'ble Civil Judge & JMFC, Kundgol, where in the Hon'ble Trial Court has directed the appellant to return the earnest money of Rs.1,30,000/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from 24.03.2014 to the date of realization, but the First appellate court has modified the judgment and decree and directed to execute the sale
NC: 2024:KHC-D:1031
deed. Being aggrieved by the said Judgment of the Lower Appellate Court, the appellant has preferred the present Appeal on the following grounds.
2. That at the stage of the Admission, the Appellant and Respondent have settled the dispute amicably, subject to the terms of this joint memo.
3. That the appellant undertakes that, there will be no any other claim by himself or by any of his family members over the respondent land bearing R.S. No. 155/3 measuring 01-acre 37-guntas of Bardwad village of Kundgol Taluka, Dist Dharwad.
4. That the Respondent agreed to pay Rs. 6,50,000/- (Six Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) apart from a sum of Rs.1,30,000/- already paid by the respondent herein, within 2 months from today.
5. That the respondent has paid the amount of Rs.50,000/-
to the appellant today i.e, on 17.01.2024, by way of cash and the said amount has been received by the appellant herein and the respondent has also agreed to pay the remaining amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- (Six Lakhs Rupees Only) by way Demand Draft.
6. That the appellant along with his Family Members have agreed to execute a deed of conveyance conveying the suit property to the respondent.
7. The terms of this joint memo is binding upon Appellant and his Family Members, and the Respondent herein."
---
3. The joint memo is signed by not only the defendant but
also his family members, namely, his wife and three children.
They are identified by the plaintiff. Since the compromise
NC: 2024:KHC-D:1031
entered into between the plaintiff and defendant, is just and
reasonable and is not opposed to any law, same is accepted.
Consequently, the impugned judgment and decree passed by
the first appellate court is modified and this appeal is disposed
off in terms of the joint memo.
4. Plaintiff, defendant and his family members have signed
the order sheet in token of the acceptance of the terms of the
joint memo.
SD/-
JUDGE BVV
CT-ASC
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!