Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt.Rathnamma vs Sri Siddaiah
2024 Latest Caselaw 3809 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3809 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt.Rathnamma vs Sri Siddaiah on 8 February, 2024

                                             -1-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC:5533
                                                    MFA No. 7421 of 2014




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                    DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                         BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
              MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7421 OF 2014 (MV)
             BETWEEN:

             1.    SMT.RATHNAMMA
                   W/O LATE D. RAJU,
                   AGED 62 YEARS,

             2.    SRI. JAGADHEESH D.R
                   S/O D. RAJU,
                   AGED 46 YEARS,

                   BOTH ARE R/O
                   DORANAHALLY VILLAGE,
                   KIRUGAVALU HOBLI,
                   MANDYA TALUK,
                   MANDYA DISTRICT-571428.
                                                             ...APPELLANTS
             (BY SRI. PRAMOD R, ADVOCATE)
             AND:

Digitally    1.    SRI SIDDAIAH
signed by
BHARATHI S         S/O SIDDEGOWDA,
Location:          MAJOR
HIGH               R/O GODDAGOWDANAKOPPALU,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA          KULKURNI POST,
                   MALAVALLI TALUK,
                   MANDYA DISTRICT 571436

             2.    THE BRANCH MANAGER
                   IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO., LTD
                   NO. 846, KANTHARAJ URS ROAD,
                   ABOVE SRI BAKERY,
                   AKSHAYA BANDAR,
                   KUVEMPUNAGAR,
                   MYSORE--571408.
                                                           ...RESPONDENTS
             (VIDE ORDER DATED 05.06.2015, NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH)
                                                  -2-
                                                                  NC: 2024:KHC:5533
                                                           MFA No. 7421 of 2014




     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 18.01.2012      PASSED IN MVC
NO.104/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MACT,
MALAVALLI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                                        JUDGMENT

The above appeal is filed by the claimant challenging

the judgment and award dated 18.1.2012 passed in MVC

No.104/2010 by the Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Malavalli,1

seeking for enhancement of the compensation awarded.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein

are referred as per their rank before the Tribunal.

3. The Tribunal by it judgment and award dated

18.1.2012 has awarded a sum of `5,32,690/- together with

interest at 6% pa., and directed the second respondent -

insurer to deposit the compensation awarded. The finding of

the Tribunal on negligence and liability are not under

challenge. Hence, the only question that arises for

Hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal'

NC: 2024:KHC:5533

consideration is with regard to the quantum of compensation

to be awarded.

4. The claim petition is filed by the wife and son

claiming compensation for the death of D.M.Raju2 in a road

traffic accident that occurred on 31.5.2010. The deceased

was aged 63 years. Hence, the appropriate multiplier is 7 as

rightly assessed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal noticing the

pension of the deceased as `8,400/- has deducted 1/3rd

towards personal expenses and calculated the loss of

dependency at `4,70,400/- which is just and proper and the

same is not being questioned by the claimants.

5. It is the contention of the claimants that the

compensation awarded under other conventional heads is

inadequate. Hence, the claimants being the wife and son are

entitled to loss of consortium as per the judgment of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Magma General

Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru

Ram and others3 and is reassessed as (`44000x2) `88000/-

Hereinafter referred to as the 'deceased

(2018) 18 SCC 130

NC: 2024:KHC:5533

. Further, a sum of `16,500/- each is awarded towards loss

of estate and funeral expenses respectively. The Tribunal

has awarded medical expenses at `27,290/- which is just

and proper.

5. Accordingly, the total compensation under

various heads is re-assessed as follows:

Sl.No.           Heads               Amount         Amount
                                     awarded by the awarded   by
                                     Tribunal (Rs.) this    Court
                                                    (Rs.)

1.        For transportation of           15000.00       16500.00
          dead     body    and
          funeral expenses

2.        Loss of love and                10000.00            0.00
          affection to claimant
          No.2 -

3         Loss of consortium              10000.00       88000.00
          to claimant No.1

          Loss of consortium
          to both

4.        Loss of estate                       0.00      16500.00

5.        Medical expenses                27290.00       27290.00

6.        Loss of dependency             470400.00      470400.00

                           Total         532690.00      618690.00

                                                NC: 2024:KHC:5533





6. Hence, the claimants are entitled for enhanced

compensation of (`618690- `532690) `86000/- along with

interest at 6% p.a.

7. In the result, the following order is passed:

ORDER

i) The above appeal is allowed in part;

ii) The judgment and award dated 18.1.2012 passed in MVC No.104/2010 by the Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Malavalli, is modified to the extent stated herein. In all other respects, the judgment and award of the Tribunal remains unaltered.

iii) The claimants are entitled for an enhancement of `86,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till its realization in addition to the compensation awarded by the Tribunal;

iv) The second respondent - insurer is directed to deposit the said compensation together with accrued interest within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment;

NC: 2024:KHC:5533

v) The apportionment, disbursement and deposit of the enhanced compensation shall be as per the award of the Tribunal.

vi) The Registry to draw the modified decree accordingly.

vi) No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE

ND

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter