Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9692 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:13567
MFA No. 5538 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5538 OF 2015(MV-I)
BETWEEN:
KUMARA
S/O GUJJEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/O CHALLANAHALLI VILLAGE,
BILIKERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT-570 004.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VEERESH.K., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR.H.B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. B.MADHU
S/O LATE BASAVA NAYAK,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
R/O THAYUR VILLAGE,
NANJANGUD TALUK,
Digitally signed by
THEJASKUMAR N MYSORE DISTRICT-570 015.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY,
NO.442/3/4, 2ND FLOOR,
NEAR RAMASWAMY CIRCLE,
MYSORE-570 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(R1-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
BY SRI. B.A.RAMAKRISHNA., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:13567
MFA No. 5538 of 2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:19.09.2011
PASSED IN MVC NO.142/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING
OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT, AT HUNSUR.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri.Veeresh.K., learned counsel on behalf of
Sri.Chandrashekar.H.B., for the appellant and
Sri.B.A.Ramakrishna., learned counsel for respondent No.2
have appeared in person.
Notice to respondents was ordered on 10.08.2015. A
perusal of office note depicts that respondent No.1 is served
and unrepresented. He has neither engaged the services of an
advocate nor conducted that case as an party in person.
2. Though the appeal is listed today for dismissal, it is
heard finally.
3. The claimant has preferred the captioned appeal
seeking enhancement of the compensation.
4. Learned counsel for the respective parties have
urged several contentions. Heard, the contentions urged on
NC: 2024:KHC:13567
behalf of the respective parties and perused the appeal papers
with utmost care.
5. The point that requires consideration is whether the
Claimant is entitled for enhanced compensation?
6. Suffice it to note that the Tribunal extenso referred
to the material on record and awarded compensation of
Rs.35,000/- (Rupees Thirty Five Thousand only) with 6%
interest per annum from the date of petition till realization.
However, looking into the nature of injuries sustained by the
claimant in the accident, this Court deems it appropriate to
enhance the compensation to Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty
Thousand only) as against Rs.35,000/- (Rupees Thirty Five
Thousand only) awarded by the Tribunal.
7. Hence, the following:
ORDER
1. The Miscellaneous First appeal is
allowed. The Judgment dated:19.09.2011 passed
by the Fast Track Court, Hunsur in M.V.C
No.142/2011 is modified holding that the claimant
is entitled for the enhanced compensation of
NC: 2024:KHC:13567
Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with
6% interest per annum from the date of the claim
petition till the date of realization.
2. The second respondent - Insurance
Company shall deposit the enhanced global
compensation along with 6% interest within a
period of two months from the date of receipt of
the certified copy of this Judgment.
3. Needless to observe that claimant is not
entitled for interest for delay period.
4. The Registry to draw the modified award
accordingly.
5. Office is directed to transmit the original
records to the concerned Tribunal forthwith.
Sd/-
JUDGE MRP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!