Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 960 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.S.A.NO.46/2018 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
K.NARAYANA RAO
(SINCE DECEASED)
K.SRINIVASA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS,
S/O LATE K.GOPALAKRISHNAYYA,
R/AT "SHAKTHI SADAN",
KIDIYOOR UDUPI-576 148 ... APPELLANT
[BY SRI NATARAJA BALLAL A., ADVOCATE]
AND:
1. K. GURURAJA BHAT
(SINCE DECEASED)
1(a) SMT.INDIRAMMA
MAJOR,
W/O LATE K.GURURAJA BHAT
KIDIYOOR, UDUPI-576 148
1(b) SRI.ANAND BHAT
MAJOR
S/O LATE K.GURURAJA BHAT
R/AT JANARDHANA HEIGHTS,
AMBALAPADY, UDUPI-3
2
1(c) SMT.SHARADA
MAJOR
D/O LATE K.GURURAJA BHAT
R/AT YELLOOR, UDUPI TQ.
1(d) SMT.LAXMI
MAJOR,
D/O LATE K.GURURAJA BHAT
R/AT YELLOOR,
UDUPI TQ.-576148
1(e) SMT.SUNANDA
D/O LATE K.GURURAJA BHAT
R/AT KIDIYOOR,
UDUPI TQ & DIST-576148
1(f) SMT.SAVITRI
MAJOR
D/O LATE K.GURURAJA BHAT
W/O KRISHNA ACHAR,
R/AT NEAR VISHNUMOORTHY
TEMPLE, KIDIYOOR,
UDUPI TQ & DIST-576 148
1(g) SMT.SUKANYA
D/O LATE K.GURURAJA BHAT
W/O KRISHNA ACHAR,
R/AT KIDIYOOR,
UDUPI TQ & DIST-576 148
1(h) K.RAMACHANDRA BHAT
MAJOR,
S/O LATE K.GURURAJA BHAT
R/AT NEAR VISHNUMOORTHY
TEMPLE, KIDIYOOR,
UDUPI TQ & DIST-576 148
3
1(i) SMT.VANI
MAJOR,
D/O LATE K.GURURAJA BHAT
R/AT NEAR VISHNUMOORTHY
TEMPLE, KIDIYOOR,
UDUPI TQ & DIST-576 148
2. SRI.ACHUTHA BHATTA
MAJOR,
S/O SRINIVASA BHATTA,
PROPRIETOR,
HOTEL VISHNU PRASAD,
MYSURU-576 243
3. SRI.K.S.GOPALAKRISHNA BHATTA
MAJOR,
RETIRED TEACHER,
R/AT KIDIYOOR,
UDUPI-576 148
... RESPONDENTS
THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.03.2017
PASSED IN R.A.NO.12/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
DISTRICT JUDGE,UDUPI,DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND
CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 22.04.1995
PASSED IN OS.NO.9/1993 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE,
UDUPI.
THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
4
JUDGMENT
This appeal was filed in the year 2018. This Court, vide
order dated 25.10.2021 granted two weeks' time to comply with
the office objections and also made it clear that failing which, list
this matter for dismissal. Even though two weeks' time was
granted on 25.10.2021, the office objections are not complied.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office
objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!