Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. B. Suneetha vs Sri. G. Paramashivaiah
2022 Latest Caselaw 11960 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11960 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Smt. B. Suneetha vs Sri. G. Paramashivaiah on 19 September, 2022
Bench: Acting Chief Justice, S Vishwajith Shetty
                             1
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022

                       PRESENT

             THE HON'BLE MR. ALOK ARADHE
                 ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

                         AND

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

       WRIT APPEAL NO.1291/2021(LA-KIADB)

BETWEEN:

1.     SMT. B. SUNEETHA
       W/O K.S. DINESH
       AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
       RESIDING OF NO.323
       SHIVA KRUPA, 15TH CROSS
       SADASHIVANAGAR
       BANGALORE - 560 080.

2.     SRI D. VINAY
       S/O MR. K.S. DINESH
       AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
       R/O NO.323, SHIVA KRUPA
       15TH CROSS, SADASHIVANAGAR
       BANGALORE - 560 080.

3.     SRI D. VIJAYA
       D/O MR. K.S. DINESH
       AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
       R/O NO.323, SHIVA KRUPA
       15TH CROSS, SADASHIVANAGARA
       BANGALORE - 560 080.          ...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI DINESH RAON, ADV.)

AND:

1.     SRI. G. PARAMASHIVAIAH
       S/O LATE GANGAPPA
                             2
     AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
     RESIDENTOF NO.7
     KEMPANNA LYAOUT
     1ST MAIN ROAD
     PALACE GUTTAHALLI
     BANGALORE - 560 020.

2.   THE STATE OF KARNTAKA
     REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
     VIDHANA SOUDHA
     BENGALURU - 560 001.

3.   THE KARNTAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
     DEVELOPMENT BOARD
     OFFICE AT NO 14/3, II FLOOR
     RP BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
     BENGALURU - 560 001
     REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
     AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER.

4.   THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER
     THE KARNTAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
     DEVLEOPMENT BOARD (METRO RIAL PROJECT)
     1ST FLOOR, R.P. BUILDING
     NURPATHUNGA ROAD,
     BENGALURU - 560 001
     CAUVERY BHAVANA
     KEMEPGOWDA ROAD
     BENGALURU - 560 009.

5.   BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.,
     REGD. OFFICE BMTC OCMPLEX
     3RD FLOOR, KH ROAD
     SHANTHINAGAR, BENGLAURU - 560 027
     EP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

6.   COMISSIONER
     BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA
     PALIKE, BYTARAYANAPURA
     HEBBAL SUB - DIVISION
     BENGLAURU - 560 009.

7.   ASSISTANT REVENUE OFICER
     BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA
     PALIKE, KODIGEHALLI DIVISION
     SAHAKARA NAGARA, 9TH MAIN ROAD
     BENGALURU - 560 002.           ...RESPONDENTS
                             3

(BY SRI HARISH B.N, SR. COUNSEL FOR
    SRI AMITH NAYAK, ADV., FOR C/R-1;
    SRI S.S. MAHENDRA, AGA FOR R-2;
    BBMP & KIADB ARE SERVED)

     THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE          PASSED IN
W.P.NO.12988/2021 DATED 20.09.2021.

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

                    JUDGMENT

This intra court appeal has been filed against the

order dated 20.09.2021 passed by the learned Single

Judge in W.P.No.12988/2021.

2. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that

he be granted leave to withdraw the appeal. He,

however, submits that the learned Single Judge by an

order dated 08.07.2022 has directed the Reference Court

to conclude the proceedings on or before 08.09.2022. It

is further submitted that on account of the aforesaid time

limit fixed by the learned Single Judge, the right of the

appellant to contest the proceedings in the Reference

Court has been prejudiced and he has not been able to

effectively cross-examine the witnesses.

3. On the other hand, learned Senior Counsel for

the respondent no.1 has opposed the aforesaid prayer

and has submitted that no such applications have been

filed before the Reference Court. It is also submitted that

the proceedings have been kept pending before the

Reference Court as it was protracted by the appellant.

4. Be that as it may, in the fact situation of the

case, the Reference Court is directed to grant two weeks

time to the appellant to make appropriate applications

before the Reference Court. Needless to state that in

case such applications are filed, the Reference Court shall

hear the parties and pass appropriate orders in

accordance with law before the decision of the reference

pending before the Reference Court.

Accordingly, petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

JUDGE

KK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter