Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11953 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2022
-1-
CRL.A No. 100095/2015
C/W CRL.A No. 100096/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100095 OF 2015 (A-)
C/W
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100096 OF 2015
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100095 OF 2015 (A-)
BETWEEN:
RAJESAB S/O. ABBASSAHEB NIDGUNDI,
AGE:63 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS
AND AGRICULTURE, R/O:SAPTAPUR,
TQ & DIST: DHARWAD.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. AHAMED ALI J. RAHIMAN SHAH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
ANWAR ZAKI S/O. IBRAHIM SHAIKH,
AGE:43 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O: S. BEGUM BUILDING,1ST FLOOR,
2ND CROSS, GIDDAPPA BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR,
GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 032.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 378(4)(I) OF CR.P.C.,
SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY
-2-
CRL.A No. 100095/2015
C/W CRL.A No. 100096/2015
THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DHARWAD IN C.C.NO.98/2009
ON DATED 04.07.2012 C/W 99/2009 ACQUITTING THE ACCUSED
AND CONSEQUENTLY CONVICT THE ACCUSED-RESPONDENT FOR
THE O/P/U/S 138 OF N.I.ACT BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100096 OF 2015 (A-)
BETWEEN:
RAJESAB S/O. ABBASSAHEB NIDGUNDI,
AGE:63 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE,
R/O: SAPTAPUR, TQ & DIST: DHARWAD.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. AHAMED ALI J. RAHIMAN SHAH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
ANWAR ZAKI S/O. IBRAHIM SHAIKH,
AGE:43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: S. BEGUM BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR,
2ND CROSS, GIDDAPPA BLOCK,
R.T.NAGAR, GANGANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 032.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 378(4) OF CR.P.C.
SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY
THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC COURT, DHARWAD, IN
C.C.NO.99/2009 ON DATED 04.07.2012 C/W 98/2009
ACQUITTING THE ACCUSED AND CONSEQUENTLY CONVICT THE
ACCUSED-RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF NI ACT,
BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING.
-3-
CRL.A No. 100095/2015
C/W CRL.A No. 100096/2015
ORDER
No representation for the appellant.
Vide order dated 15.09.2021, a show-cause notice
was issued to the appellant and it was duly served.
Though on the last two hearing dates, at the request of
learned counsel for the appellant the matters were
adjourned as a last chance, today there is no
representation for the appellant. Hence, the appeals are
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
PJ
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!