Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11945 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19 T H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1571 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
Sri Kumaraswamy
(@Kumar @ Kiran)
S/o Shivaramaih
Aged about 38 years
R/at Kaggere Village
Irakasand ra Post
Chelur Hob li, Gubbi Taluk
Tumkur District-572 117.
...Appellant
(By Sri Christop her Noel A, Ad vocate)
AND:
The State of Karnataka
By Malleshwaram Police Station
Now CID Police Bang alore
Pin-560001.
...Respondent
(By Sri Vishal B.M. Advocate for
Sri Ashok Naik, Spl.P.P.)
This Criminal Appeal is filed und er Section 12 of
Karnataka Control of Org anized Crime Act, 2000
praying to set asid e the ord er dated 10.08.2022
passed in Sp l.C.C. No.417/2016 on the file of the
learned Prl. City Sessions and Sp l. Court, Bang alore in
:: 2 ::
rejecting the b ail app lication filed under Section 439
of the Cod e of Criminal Procedure 1973 and etc,.
This Criminal Appeal coming on for admission
this d ay, the Court d elivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. Christopher Noel A., learned
counsel for the appellant and Sri. Vishal B.M., for
Ashok Nayak, Special Public Prosecutor for the
respondent.
2. This is an appeal under section 12 of the
Karnataka Control of Organized Crime, 2000. The
appellant is accused no.1 in Spl.C.C.No.417/2016
on the file of Prl. City Civil and Sessions Judge,
Bengaluru. He and other accused are facing trial
in relation to offences punishable under sections
411, 454, 457, 380, 381, 461, 166, 120B, 201 r/w
109 IPC, under sections 115 and 23(iii) of
Karnataka Education Act and section 13(1)(D) r/w
13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and sections :: 3 ::
3(i)(ii), 3(2), 3(4) and 3(5) of Karnataka Control
of Organized Crimes Act,2000, ('KCOCA' for short).
2. The case pertains to leaking of question
paper of second year Pre-University examination
held for the academic year 2015-16. The
allegation against the appellant is that he entered
to the Treasury/strong room of Hanagal Taluk,
opened the seal of the question paper bundle and
took the photographs of the question papers and
circulated the same. Learned counsel refers to the
evidence of PW.62 to argue that his evidence
discloses that the seal put on the bundle was
intact and thereby the involvement of the
appellant in the commission of the offence can be
doubted. But his argument cannot be given
credence at this stage because if the evidence
given by PW.62 is considered, it amounts to
appreciating the evidence. It does not lie within
the jurisdiction of this court while deciding the :: 4 ::
appeal preferred against rejection of application
for bail.
3. Sri. Vishal B.M. opposes the appeal by
arguing that the appellant is the main accused and
on earlier occasions his six applications for bail
stood dismissed. Now also there are no grounds
for granting bail.
4. Though the prosecution has invoked the
KCOCA Act, it remains a fact that the appellant
has been in custody for the last 6 ½ years. The
maximum sentence that can be imposed in relation
to offence under sections 380 and 381 IPC is
seven years and for the offence under the KCOCA,
the imprisonment period should not be less than
five years. Since the appellant has spent 6 ½
years in jail and as it appears that the trial may
not be completed within a few months, it is
desirable to grant bail to the appellant. Hence the
following:
:: 5 ::
ORDER
Appeal is allowed.
The order passed by the Prl.City
Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru
dated 10.08.2022 in Spl.
C.C.No.417/2016 is set aside.
The appellant is admitted to bail on
obtaining from him a bond for
Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only)
and two sureties for the likesum to the
satisfaction of the trial court. The
appellant is also subjected to following
conditions:-
i. He shall not tamper with the
evidence collected by the
investigating officer and threaten
the witnesses.
ii. He shall regularly appear before the trial court till conclusion of the trial.
:: 6 ::
iii. Till conclusion of the trial, the appellant shall mark his attendance before the jurisdictional police once in 15 days, preferably on Sunday between 9 am and 12 noon.
iv. He shall not get involved in any other criminal case/s in future. In case of any FIR is registered against him or if he violates any of the bail conditions, the same will be considered for cancellation of bail.
Sd/-
JUDGE sd
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!