Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11940 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.DESAI
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.200013/2020
BETWEEN:
JAVEED PATEL S/O MAHATAB PATEL
AGE: 45 YEARS OCC: BUSINESS
R/O: H.NO.5-993/38 OPP: MIRAJ MAJEED
NEW RAHMAT NAGAR, RING ROAD,
KALABURAGI.
...PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. G. B. YADAV, ADVOCATE)
AND:
AISHWARAYA FINANACE CORPORATION (REGD)
III, IST FLOOR, DARSHAN EDIFICE, NEAR
JAGAT POST OFFICE, SUPER MARKET, MAIN ROAD,
KALABURAGI.
THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER
ESHWAR S/O SHIVASHANKARAPPA NIGUDGI
AGE: 44 YEARS OCC: BUSINESS
R/O: GULBARGA
THROUGH ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
VISHWANATH S/O SHESHAPPA PANCHAL
AGE: 46 YEARS OCC: MANAGER IN THE COMPLAINT FIRM
R/O: GANDHI NAGAR,
KALABURAGI-585 104.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. GANESH S. KALABURAGI, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 397 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973,
PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE CASE IN
CRL.A.NO.32/2019 OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE COURT AND THAT OF C.C.NO.3061/2013 ON THE FILE OF
THE IV ADDITIONAL JMFC AT KALABURAGI, MAGISTRATE,
EXAMINE THE LEGALITY, THE PROPRIETY AND CORRECTNESS OF
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE LOWER AND ALSO OF THE
FINDINGS CONTAINED IN TWO JUDGMENTS AND SET-ASIDE
THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED III ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE
CONFIRMING JUDGMENT IN CRL.APPEAL NO.32/2019 DATED:
11.11.2019 AND ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT NAMELY
IV ADDITIONAL JMFC AT KALABURAGI MAGISTRATE IN
C.C.NO.3061/2013 DATED 14.03.2019 AND DIRECT THE
ACQUITTAL OF THE PETITIONER OF THE CHARGES LEVELED
AGAINST HIM.
THIS PETITION COMNG ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo,
which reads as under:
"the counsel for the revision petitioner hereby seeks permission to withdraw the above revision petition as not pressed. Hence, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased permit for the withdrawal of the above case."
02. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
03. The complainant before the Trial Court who is
respondent in this petition is at liberty to withdraw the
amount if any deposited before the Trial Court. The same
shall be released in favour complainant-respondent after
proper identification and verification with
acknowledgement.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KJJ
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!