Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Nagaraj vs The Deputy Commissioner
2022 Latest Caselaw 13188 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13188 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Sri Nagaraj vs The Deputy Commissioner on 21 November, 2022
Bench: Alok Aradhe, S Vishwajith Shetty
                           1



 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022

                       PRESENT

        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

                         AND

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY

             W.A. No.1045 OF 2021 (SC/ST)
                          IN
             W.P. No.9661 OF 2019 (SC/ST)
BETWEEN:

1. SRI. NAGARAJ
   S/O SAMPANGAPPA
   AGED 40 YEARS.

2. SRI. VENKATESH
   S/O SAMPANGAPPA
   AGED 51 YEARS.

     BOTH ARE R/AT
     DODDATHOGAR VILLAGE
     BEGUR HOBLI
     BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK
     BNGALURU - 560 100.

                                     ... APPELLANTS
(BY MRS. MANJULA D, ADV., FOR
     MR. L. SRINIVASA BABU, ADV.,)

AND:

1.    THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
      BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
      BENGALURU - 560 009.
                           2




2.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
     BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION
     BENGALURU - 560 030.

3.   KRISHNAMURTHY
     S/O B G HANUMANTHAIAH
     MAJOR
     R/AT APARTMENT NO.D-45
     LEGACY DIMORA, KAKKUR PLANTATION
     YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 002.

4.   SRI. GOUTHAM REDDY
     S/O M V REDDY, MAJOR
     R/AT NO.1, 9TH CROSS
     RMV 2ND STAGE
     CENTRAL EXCISE LAYOUT
     BHOOPASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 094.

5.   SRI. RAGHAVENDRA NAIK
     S/O LATE SINGAPPA NAIK
     MAJOR
     R/AT NO.589, 8TH BLOCK
     KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095.

6.   D R G V SUJITH
     S/O DR G S VISHWANATH
     AGED 45 YEARS
     R/AT NO.172, 13TH CROSS
     3RD PHASE, GIRINAGAR
     BENGALURU - 560 085.

7.   MRS. RASHMA KRISHNAMURTHY
     W/O B H KRISHNAMURTHY
     MAJOR
     R/AT APARTMENT NO.45
     LEGACY DIMORA, KAKKAUR PLANTATION
     YELAHANKA, BENGLURU - 560 002.

8.   SRI. SURESH
     S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, MAJOR.
                             3




9.   SRI. ANIL KUMAR
     S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA
     MAJOR.

     R8 & R9 ARE R/AT
     DODDATHOGAUR VILLAGE
     BEGUR HOBLI
     BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 562122.

10. SRI. K VENKATESH
    S/O KRISHNAPPA, MAJOR
    R/AT NO.148, 2ND CROSS
    BILEKAHALLI LAYOUT
    B G ROAD,
    BENGALURU - 560 078.

11. SRI. JYOTHAPPA @ JYOTHAIAH
    S/O SAMPANGAPPA, MAJOR
    R/AT DODDATHOGUR VILLAGE
    BEGURU HOBLI
    BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 562 122.

12. SRI. C RAJAPPA
    S/O LATE CHINAPPA
    AGED 57 YEARS
    R/AT JAIBHEEM NAGAR
    A K COLONY, WARD NO.17,
    ANEKAL, ANEKAL TALUK
    BENGALURU - 562 106.

                                       ... RESPONDENTS

(BY MR. B. RAJENDRA PRASAD, HCGP FOR R1 & R2
    MR. VIVEK K.G. ADV., FOR R3, R6 & R7
R8 , R10, R11, R12 ARE SERVED)

                        ---
                              4



     THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR
RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 09.08.2021 IN WP
No.9661/2019 (SC-ST) AND ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL AS
PRAYED.

    THIS W.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                      JUDGMENT

Smt.Manjula.D, learned counsel for the

appellant.

Mr.B.Rajendra Prasad, learned High Court

Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.

Mr.Vivek K.G., learned counsel for the

respondent Nos.3, 6 and 7.

This intra Court appeal has been filed against

order dated 09.08.2021 passed by the learned Single

Judge in W.P.No.9661/2019.

2. Learned counsel for the

appellant, while inviting the attention of this Court to

the compromise arrived at between the parties,

submitted that the appellant has filed a memo seeking

leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal as the

matter has been amicably settled. It is further

submitted that since the matter has been settled, the

requirement of deposit of Rs.50,000/- as cost, be

dispensed with.

3. In view of the aforesaid submission, for the

reasons assigned in the memo and taking into

account the fact that the dispute has been amicably

settled, order dated 09.08.2021 passed by the learned

Single Judge insofar as it pertains to a direction to

deposit cost of Rs.50,000/-, is set aside.

Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in terms of

compromise arrived at between the parties.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE RV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter