Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1233 Kant
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.366/2019 (SP)
BETWEEN:
SRI M E PRASANNA KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
S/O M.R ETHIRAJALU NAIDU
R/AT NO.544, 7TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS,
HANUMANTHANAGAR, BANGALORE
REPRESENTED BY HIS
GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
SRI A RAJASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
S/O LATE APPURAO
R/AT NO.74/4, 3RD CROSS,
K.G.NAGAR, SOMURA PURA
BANGALORE - 560 019.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI K.SUMAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI SIDDARTH SUMANN, ADV.)
AND:
1. SRI MUNIVENKATAPPA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
S/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA
2. SRI MUNIRAJU
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA,
2
3. SMT. GOWRAMMA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
W/O MUNIRAJU,
S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA,
4. SRI MANJUNATH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA,
5. SMT. RATHNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
D/O MUNIVENKATAPPA,
6. SRI BIRESHA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA,
7. SRI CHIKKANNA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA,
8. SMT. NARAYANAMMA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
W/O CHIKKANNA
9. SRI MUNIKRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
S/O CHIKKANNA
10. SMT MALA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
W/O MUNIKRISHNAPPA
11. SMT MANJULADEVI
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
D/O CHIKKANNA
12. SRI SANTHOSH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
S/O CHIKKANNA
13. SRI NAGARAJU @ NAGARAJAPPA
3
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
W/O NAGARAJA
14. SMT PARVATHAMMA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
W/O NAGARAJA @ NAGARAJAPPA
15. SRI MANJUNATHA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
S/O NAGARAJA @ NAGARAJAPPA
16. SMT SOWMYA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
D/O NAGARAJA @ NAGARAJAPPA
17. SRI ANISKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
S/O NAGARAJA @ NAGARAJAPPA
18. SMT NARAYANAMMA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
D/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA
19. SMT LAKSHMAMMA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
D/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA,
20. SMT GOWRAMMA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
D/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA,
21. SMT MOTAMMA @ RATHNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
D/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA,
ALL ARE R/AT GANGAPURA VILLAGE,
NANDAGUDI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK-560 114
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
... RESPONDENTS
(R-2 SERVED.)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.96 R/W ORDER
XLI, RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
4
DATED 01.10.2018 PASSED IN OS.NO.275/2017 ON THE FILE OF
THE I ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR DISMISSING THE
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, S.SUJATHA J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Appellant is entitled to refund of court fee as per the
provisions of the Karnataka Court Fees & Suits Valuation Act,
1958. The same shall be transferred by the Registry to the
bank account of the appellant through RTGS after the details
of the account are furnished by the appellant.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE Chs CT-HR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!