Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11510 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
R.S.A.NO.1387/2013(PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. DODDAKKA
W/O NARAYANAPPA
DEAD BY LRS
1. SRI NARAYANAPPA
S/O LATE KEMPANNA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
R/O KARKALAGHATTA
HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI
KORATAGERE TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 121.
2. SRI SHIVANNA
S/O NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
R/O KARKALAGHATTA
HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI
KORATAGERE TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 121.
3. SMT HANUMAKKA
W/O RAMASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/O KONANAKUNTE
AVALAHALLI
2
ANJANAPURA POST
BANGALORE - 560 062.
4. SMT LAXMAMMA
W/O GOVINDARAJU
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
R/O KARKALAGHATTA
HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI
KORATAGERE TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 121.
5. SMT GOWRAMMA
W/O SUBRAMANYA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
R/O KONANAKUNTE AVALAHALLI
ANJANAPURA POST
BANGALORE - 560 062.
6. SMT MANJAMMA
W/O GANGA ARASAIAH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/O HUSKUR
DASANAPURA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 123. ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.G.PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. NARASIMHA
S/O LATE DODDANARASIMHAIAH
SINCE DEAD BY LR'S
1. SRI SIDDALINGAIAH
S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
3
2. SRI NARASIMHAMURTHY
S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
3. SRI JAGADEESH
S/O NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
4. SMT PADMAVATHI
D/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
5. SMT RANGAMMA @ SANNAMMA
D/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
6. SMT CHANDRIKA
D/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6 ARE
RESIDENTS OF KARAKALAGHATTA VILLAGE
HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI
KORATAGERE TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 121.
7. SRI JAYALAKSHMAMMA
W/O LATE GOVINDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
R/O JAMENAHALLI
KORATAGERE TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 121.
8. SMT PUTTAMMA
W/O LATE LAKSHMANA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
R/O BELLEPALYA
4
GUBBI TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 562 216.
9. SMT KEMPAMMA
W/O NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
GANDHIHALLI
BUKKAPATNA POST
KORATAGERE TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 121. ... RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 17/04/2013 PASSED
IN R.A.NO.220/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING
OFFICER, FTC-V, MADHUGIRI, DISMISSING THE
APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND
DECREE DATED 21/11/2000 PASSED IN O.S.NO.12/92
ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) & JMFC.,
KORETAGERE. TRAIL COURT DISMISSED THE SUIT.
APPELLATE COURT DISMISSED THE APPEAL SUIT FOR
PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS RSA IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
On 10-03-2016, this Court had extended time by
another two weeks to comply with the office objections,
subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- to the Library
Fund of Advocates' Association, Bengaluru.
Neither the cost of Rs.2,000/- has been paid nor the
office objections are complied with, as on today. Hence,
the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance.
Sd/-
JUDGE
mpk/-*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!