Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jawed Akhtar vs The State Of Jharkhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 6705 Jhar

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6705 Jhar
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2025

Jharkhand High Court

Jawed Akhtar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 4 November, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
       IN     THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                            Cr. Rev. No. 1010 of 2025
       Jawed Akhtar, aged about 49 years, Son of Late
       Yaseen Ansari, resident of Kokdoro, P.O. and P.S.-
       Pithoria, District-Ranchi.
                                                    .....   ...    Petitioner
                                    Versus
       1. The State of Jharkhand.
       2. Gazala Rubi, wife of Md. Mohibullah, resident
       of Nizam Nagar, Mani Tola, P.O. and P.S.-
       Doranda, District-Ranchi..
                                                    .....   ...    Opposite Parties
                              --------

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate.

      For the State           :        Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P.
      For the O.P. No. 2      :        Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate.
                              ------
04/ 04.11.2025     Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the I.A. has been prepared for grant of bail during the pendency of this petition, however, the same has not been filed before the Registry, as the matter is listed on the Board. The copy of the said I.A. has been served upon the learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2 in course of the court proceeding itself.

2. In view of the above, the said I.A. is taken on record, which is numbered as I.A. No. 14707 of 2025.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits this revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 16.07.2025, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 109 of 2025 by the learned Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, whereby the learned appellate court has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner and affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 01.03.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2408 of 2023, by which, the petitioner was held guilty for the offence under Section 138 of NI Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and also to pay a fine of Rs.

9,00,000/- by way of compensation and in default of payment, the petitioner is further directed to undergo simple imprisonment for two months.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of this petition, I.A. No. 14707 of 2025 has been filed. He submits that the petitioner has already paid a sum of Rs. 2.45 lakhs to the complainant / O.P. No. 2. He next submits that petitioner is in custody since 29.08.2025. On instruction, he submits that petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- in the form of Demand Draft to the O.P. No. 2 at the time of furnishing bail bond and he is also ready to compromise the case. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be released on regular bail.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State submits that the matter is arising out of Section 138 of the NI Act.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2 / complainant submits that if the petitioner is ready to compromise the case, the O.P. No. 2 is also ready to compromise the case.

7. Considering that both the parties are ready to compromise the case, in that view of the matter, the petitioner and the O.P. No. 2 are put at liberty to sit together and come to the certain terms and conditions of the compromise and to file an I.A. to that effect in the present case within four weeks from today.

8. Since the matter is arising out of Section 138 of NI Act and the petitioner has already paid a sum of Rs. 2.45 lakhs to the complainant / O.P. No. 2 and further the petitioner is ready to pay a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the O.P. No. 2 in the form of demand draft at the time of furnishing bail bond, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on regular bail subject to payment of Rs. 1,00,000/- as submitted, during the pendency of this petition, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2408 of 2023.

9. The aforementioned I.A. is allowed and disposed of.

10. Both the parties are at liberty to file an I.A. petition in the form of compromise, if the settlement is arrived at between the parties.

11. Let this matter appear on 15.12.2025.

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-04.11.2025 Amitesh/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter