Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4629 Jhar
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No.449 of 2006
-------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-------
For the Petitioner :Ms. Apurva Pathak, Adv. For the Opp. Party-Sate :Mrs. Sweta Singh, APP
-------
9/18.11.2022 Heard Ms. Apurva Pathak, learned Amicus. She assailed the impugned judgment on the ground that essential elements of Section 494 are not fulfilled in this case. She further referred the judgment in the case of Parminder Kaur & Ors. Vs. the State of Punjab, reported in (2020) 8 SCC 811 and in the case of Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande Vs. Maharastra report in AIR 1965 SC 1564 and in the case of Digamber Vaishnaw Vs. State of Chhattisgarh. She further contended that prosecution failed to give best evidence and also submitted a written notes of argument.
Learned APP is present and opposed the prayer of the learned Amicus.
Put up this case on 6.01.2023.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Fahim/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!