Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bodhi Pandit vs The State Of Jharkhand & Others
2022 Latest Caselaw 2530 Jhar

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2530 Jhar
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2022

Jharkhand High Court
Bodhi Pandit vs The State Of Jharkhand & Others on 8 July, 2022
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                W.P.(Cr.) No. 0143 of 2011
            Bodhi Pandit                                           ..... Petitioner
                                           Versus
            The State of Jharkhand & Others                        ..... Respondents
                                            -----

CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

-----

            For the Petitioner:       Mr. Arwind Kumar
            For the State:            Mr. Sreenu Garapati, S.C-III
                                            -----


27/08.07.2022      It appears that during pendency of the present writ petition, the accused

persons of Bogodar (Saria) P.S. Case No. 88/2010 [G.R. No. 1013/2010] which was

instituted under Sections 366(A)/34/120(B) IPC have been acquitted by learned

District & Additional Sessions Judge-II, Gridih vide judgment dated 26.03.2019

passed in S.T. No. 264/2017.

On perusal of the said judgment, it appears that none of the prosecution

witnesses has supported the case of the prosecution. The petitioner of this case,

namely, Bodhi Pandit @ Bodhi Mahto has also been examined in the trial as PW.5 and

he has deposed that as per information given to him by her sister Tekni Devi (the

mother of the victim), Preeti Kumari (victim) went somewhere and could not be

traced out. P.Ws. 2 & 3 have deposed that the victim fled away with a person

whereas PW.4 has deposed that the victim fled away and solemnized marriage with a

person.

It is a matter of utmost surprise that till conclusion of the trial, which ended in

acquittal of the accused persons, the police has not been able to trace out/recover

the victim girl. If the deposition of the aforesaid prosecution witnesses is taken to be

true, the victim girl must be staying somewhere in India and hence the inaction of

the police in not tracing the victim girl, cannot be ignored by this Court. Though the

present writ petition is pending for last about 11 years wherein different affidavits

have been filed by the police officials on which several directions have been given to

recover the victim girl, yet she could not be traced till conclusion of the trial.

Under the aforesaid circumstances, this Court showing displeasure against the

police officials, directs the Superintendent of Police, Giridih to remain physically

present before this Court on the next date fixed.

Put up this case on 05.08.2022 under the same heading.

Satish/-                                                              (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter