Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 82 J&K
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2025
Sr. No. 18
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Case No:- CPSW No. 4/2011 in
SWP No. 1565/2009
Shashi Chib .....Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Gulzar Ahmed Qureshi and Ors. ..... Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
07.05.2025
1. In the instant contempt petition, the petitioner has
alleged non-compliance of order/judgment dated 01.11.2010 passed in
SWP No. 1565/2009, in terms whereof, the respondents came to be directed to HIGH OF JAMMU & operate the panel and issue appointment orders in favour of the candidates in COURT order of merit pertainingKtoAthe SH Mof post I RTeaching A N DGuide under Rebhar-e-Taleem L A D position.
Scheme keeping in view the vacancy AKH
2. Statement of the facts have been filed by the respondents, wherein
it is being, inter-alia, stated that ReT teacher was intended to be filled up by the
respondents for newly upgraded Upper Primary School, Dhora pursuant to the
Advertisement Notice No. DIP/J-6844 dated 05.02.2009, wherein eleven
candidates had applied and a prospective panel of two candidates, namely,
Miss Pooja Sambyal and Shashi Chib was drawn by the Zonal Education
Officer, Vijapur and was published for inviting objections thereto and upon
receipt of objections, the said panel was returned back qua the petitioner with
the remarks that one-Pinky Devi has superior merit than the petitioner and
consequently, the Zonal Education Officer, Vijapur came to be directed to draw
and frame a fresh panel, aggrieved whereof, the said Sashi Chib
(petitioner herein) preferred a writ petition before this Court, whereunder the
instant petition has arisen.
3. At this stage, Mr. Raman Sharma, learned AAG appearing for the
respondents/contemnors stated at the bar that the petitioner herein
stands engaged as ReT Teacher on 18.03.2013 and consequently, regularized as
General Line Teacher w.e.f. 22.06.2018.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid statement made by Mr. Raman
Sharma, learned AAG, seemingly the judgment complained of, has been
complied with. Accordingly, contempt notice issued is recalled and contempt
proceedings are closed with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the instant
contempt petition within four weeks from today in case, cause survives.
(Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge Jammu 07.05.2025 Javid Iqbal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!