Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2011 j&K
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2022
Sr. No. 37
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 434/2014
Bharat Bushan Suri .... Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. M.K. Raina, Advocate
V/s
B.R. Sharma and another .....Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Sumeet Bhatia, GA
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondents admits that the judgment which is
sought to be complied with has not been implemented in toto, however, submits
that the judgment has been complied with partially and the reasons for not
complying with the judgment in toto is that some criminal proceedings are
pending against the petitioner which are at final stage. The case is pending
against the petitioner under Section 480, 463, 464 and 471 RPC in the court of
learned JMIC (Sub-Judge) Baramulla and the next date has been fixed on
26.12.2022. He, however, apprised the Court that the statement of witnesses has
been recorded and he seeks some more time to comply with the judgment,
hence, for the reasons which are mentioned hereinabove, the judgment could
not be complied with.
Time is extended by six weeks' to comply with the judgment dated
11.09.2003 and let the fresh compliance report/statement of facts be filed by or
before the next date of hearing.
List on 14.02.2023.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
Jammu 19.12.2022 Vishal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!