Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 996 j&K
Judgement Date : Shamim Akhtar vs
S. No.4
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 41/2001
Shamim Akhtar ...Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Dalvinder Kumar, Adv. Vice
Mr. Anil Sethi, Adv.
v/s
<
't
Farooq Ahmad .....Respondent(s)
Through :-
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not received
instructions from the petitioner for a long time and, therefore, it appears that the
judgment of which non-compliance is alleged might have been complied with.
In view of the above, this petition is accordingly dismissed for non
prosecution.
(SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JAMMU 01.09.2021 Paramjeet Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!