Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 364 j&K/2
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2021
S. No. 212
After Notice Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT SRINAGAR
CR No. 43/2018
Ghulam Mohammad Kanjal and Anr. .....Petitioner(s)
Through: None
V/s
Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd. and Ors. ..... Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Shuja-ul-Haq, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
29.03.2021
This revision has been filed against the order, whereby the order of Trial Court refusing injunction, was upheld.
It is submitted by learned appearing counsel for respondents that revision against the order, under challenge, is not maintainable. In this regard, he has referred to a judgment passed in a case titled Manohar Lal v. Romesh Chander, reported in 2012 (1) JKJ 411.
None has appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called out today. Adjourned.
List on 31.03.2021.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 29.03.2021 "Manzoor"
MANZOOR UL HASSAN DAR 2021.03.31 11:24
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!