Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 306 j&K
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2021
S. Nos. 205
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT JAMMU
OWP No. 236/2007
IA No. 361/2007
IA No. 99001/2008
[D-787/2008])
Babu Ram ...Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. K. S. Johal, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Supreet Singh Johal, Advocate
v/s <
State of J&K and others
't
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
For the last several dates of hearing, there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The matter came to be listed on 23.04.2007, 30.06.2008, 14.07.2008, 17.06.2020 & 29.06.2020, on which dates, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Today also, when the case was called out, nobody turned up to represent the petitioner. It is, thus, apparent that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecution of this petition. Otherwise, also the relief claimed by the petitioner that he is entitled for regularization of his possession over the State land in view of the Jammu and Kashmir State Land (Vesting of Ownership to Occupants) Act, 2001, cannot be granted, in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court, declaring the aforesaid Act, as unconstitutional.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JAMMU 16.03.2021 Shivalee Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
SHIVALEE KHAJURIA 2021.03.17 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!