Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 708 j&K/2
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2021
Sr. No. 204
Advance List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT SRINAGAR
OWP No. 45/2012
Mohammad Shafi Dand ...Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
Mohammad Sofi & Ors. ...Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
05.07.2021
This petition under Article 227 read with Section 104 of the J&K Constitution has been preferred so as to challenge the judgment and order dated 11th November 2011 by which the court of first instance rejected the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
The court rejected the claim on the ground that the suit appears to be barred by law as the land in respect of which injunction has been sought has already been acquired in accordance with law.
The rejection of a plaint amounts to a decree as has been held in Abdul Rashid Rather vs. Ghulam Ahmad Ganai 2011 (2) J&K Judgment 849. In view of the fact that the order rejecting the plaint in exercise of power under Order 7 Rule 11 is in the nature of a decree, it is appealable under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
In view of the above, the petition is not maintainable and is barred on the ground of alternate remedy. It is accordingly dismissed.
Record of the trial court be returned.
(SANJAY DHAR) (PANKAJ MITHAL)
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
SRINAGAR
05.07.2021
Altaf
MOHAMMAD ALTAF NIMA
2021.07.06 14:42
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!