Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Mohd. Imran Khan vs State Of J&K And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 1763 j&K

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1763 j&K
Judgement Date : 28 December, 2021

Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Dr. Mohd. Imran Khan vs State Of J&K And Ors on 28 December, 2021
      THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                         AT JAMMU


                                                            SWP No. 1518/2017
                                                            IA No. 01/2017 &
                                                            IA No. 01/2018

                                                  Pronounced on : 28.12.2021

Dr. Mohd. Imran Khan
                                                     .....Petitioner/Appellant(s)
                                     Through:- Mr. K. K. Pathan, Advocate

                  V/s

State of J&K and ors.
                                                            ......Respondent(s)
                                    Through:- Mr. H. A. Siddiqui, Sr. AAG

CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

                                 JUDGMENT

01. The Mission Director, National Health Mission issued

Advertisement Notice No. SHS/NHM/J&K/J/6590-93 dated 01.08.2016 for

hiring of services of Medical Officers (AYUSH) under National Health

Mission. The applications were invited for the vacant posts in the various

health institutions in the State and under Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram

(RBSK) scheme and amongst others, one post was advertised for district

Poonch in PHC Sawjian. The petitioner possesses the requisite qualification of

Bachelor in AYUSH and being eligible also applied for the said post in PHC

Sawjian in District Poonch.

02. Petitioner seeks quashing of corrigendum No. SHS/NHM/J&K/3488-

94 dated 29.05.2017 published in the newspaper so far as it pertains to

withdrawal of the earlier corrigendum No. SHS/NHM/J&K/9200-05 dated

03.09.2016 and also directions to the respondents to complete the selection

process for the post of Medical Officer in PHC Bandi Chachain on contractual

basis.

03. It appears that respondent No. 3 issued corrigendum on 03.09.2016

regarding advertisement notice for hiring of Medical Officers in Poonch

instead of PHC Sawjian, it would be read as location as PHC, Bandi Chachain

in pursuance to the notice dated 01.08.2016. Respondent No. 3 again vide

another corrigendum/Addendum regarding the same advertisement Notice

withdrawing the earlier corrigendum dated 03.09.2016 vide notice dated

29.05.2017.

04. The petitioner is aggrieved of this withdrawal of the corrigendum

dated 03.09.2016 as the same is not sustainable in law. According to the

petitioner, there is no vacant post of Medical Officer at PHC Sawjian. The only

vacant post lying is at PHC Bandi Chachain and therefore, respondents are

under legal obligation to complete selection proves for the post of Medical

Officer at PHC Bandi Chachain. The purpose of the National Rural Health

Mission is to ensure health facility to remote and far flung areas, therefore,

same should have been filled by completing selection proves for PHC Bandi

Chachain but this has been deliberately denied y the respondents for malafide

reasons. It is also stated that accordingly to the petitioner, Dr. Mohd. Sharif

Qazmi was terminated from service at PHC PHC Bandi Chachain due to

overage, therefore, the only post that is lying vacant is at PHC Bandi Chachain.

05. The respondents in their objections have vehemently denied the

averments of the petitioner. It is submitted that their office had advertised the

post initially for PHC Sawjian but there was a communication from the office

of Chief Medical Officer, Poonch dated 26.06.2016 which informed that the

post of Medical Officer (AYUSH) at PHC Sawjian already filled and therefore,

there was no vacancy available there. However, one post of Medical Officer

(AYUSH) was vacant at PHC Bandi Chachain, therefore, it was requested to

read vacant post of Medical Officer (AYUSH) at PHC Bandi Chachain instead

of PHC Sawjian. Subsequently, the Chief Medical Officer, Poonch send

another communication on 03.09.2016 stating that one vacant post of Medical

Officer (AYUSH) was advertised for PHC Bandi Chachain and vide

communication dated 20.05.2017, it was informed that PHC Bandi Chachain

is located in rural areas with more than 30000 population where there was non-

availability of Medical Officer. Therefore, Dr. Bubishan Kumar, Medical

Officer (AYUSH) under NHM was providing his services from 2012 till date.

After rationalization of Human Resource at PHC Bandi Chachain, it was

requested that vacancy of Medical Officer (AYUSH) was available at PHC

Sawjian which was initially advised to be considered for advertisement,

accordingly, the corrigendum dated 03.09.2016 was withdrawn. The entire

selection process was stayed by this Court vide order dated 20.06.2017 as a

result of which people of the area are suffering on account of non-availability

of health care services.

06. The respondents have issued advertisement for hiring of Medical

Officers under NHM under the scheme of Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram

(RBSK), accordingly, posts under this scheme are purely contractual and shall

be hired initially for a period of eleven months or 31 st of March, 2017,

whichever is earlier and may be extended on performance basis or continuation

of the scheme. The stay of the post of Medical Officer at PHC Sawjian

remains till date. The petitioner has been unable to prove that there is any

ulterior or malafide reasons for the corrigendum being issued, the respondents

have explained that with the rationalization of the Human Resources and filling

of the post at PHC Bandi Chachain and in terms of office communication of

Chief Medical Officer, corrigendum dated 03.09.2016 stands withdrawn and

post remain that of the initially advertised.

07. This scheme being for the benefit of the public and public interest is

being affected due to the non-selection and appointment of the Medical

Officer. This apart, the petitioner having also applied as per his own averments

for the selection process at PHC Sawjian cannot be said to be prejudice by the

withdrawal of the corrigendum dated 03.09.2016.

08. In view of the aforesaid, there is no merit in this petition and the same is,

accordingly, dismissed alongwith connected IAs.

(Sindhu Sharma) Judge JAMMU 28 .12.2021 SUNIL-II Whether the order is speaking : Yes Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No

RAM MURTI 2021.12.31 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter