Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1717 j&K/2
Judgement Date : 31 December, 2021
S. No. 37
Before Notice Matters
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU &KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) No. 467/2021
CrlM No. 1500/2021
Nafia Nazir
.....Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Salih Pirzada, Adv.
V/s
U.T J&K And Ors. ..... Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge.
ORDER
31.12.2021 Through the medium of instant petition, the petitioner has sought a
direction upon respondent No. 5-Senior Superintendent of Police, Crime
Branch, Kashmir for completion of preliminary verification in the case
bearing No. PVK No. 79/2021. It appears that the petitioner was holding the
post of Executive Assistant with the respondent No. 3. Certain Audit
observation have been made during the audit inspection wherein it was
remarked that the post of Executive Assistant post held by the petitioner was
already being held by one Ms. Wafa Bhat, who had proceeded on leave and
that the said post was to be held by the petitioner for a period of one year or
till Ms. Wafa Bhat resumed her duty. It appears that a subsequent
observation was made by the Audit Committee. Excerpts whereof have been
reproduced in the petition and the same are given as under:
"It is a matter of interpretation of codal provision whether the post of Executive Assistant could have been advertised in the given circumstances and also whether Ms. Nafia Nazir could have been appointed against the said post of Executive Assistant before forfeiture of claim of Ms. Wafa Bhat to resume her duties in terms of Order No. JKEDI/H-181 dated 25.03.2013."
Page |2 CRM(M) No. 467/2021 CrlM No. 1500/2021
Petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition bearing WP(C) No.
1465/2021 seeking certain directions against the respondent No. 4 herein and
in the said writ petition, the aforesaid facts were highlighted by the
petitioner. The writ petition came to be disposed of by this Court on
02.08.2021 whereby petitioner was asked to submit a representation qua
grievance projected in the writ petition before the respondent therein and
the said respondent was asked to accord consideration to the same on its own
merits within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of said
representation.
It seems that pursuant to aforesaid order petitioner has made
representation before respondent no. 4 but the representation has not been
disposed of as the said respondent has intimated the petitioner that
respondent No. 5 who is conducting the preliminary verification has
precluded any further action on the representation of the petitioner. Now the
petitioner has moved the instant petition seeking a direction upon the
respondent No. 5-Crime Branch, Kashmir to culminate the preliminary
verification registered as PVK No. 79/2021 without being influenced by the
comments of the Finance Department or any other authority.
Learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of hearing has
submitted that petitioner would feel satisfied if the petition is disposed of by
directing respondent no. 5-Crime Branch, Kashmir to expedite the
preliminary verification into the aforesaid case after taking into
consideration the audit observation made vide No. JKEDI/J/GO/2013/616-
20 dated 25.03.2013. Learned counsel has further submitted that even
otherwise respondent No. 5 is obliged to complete preliminary verification Page |3 CRM(M) No. 467/2021 CrlM No. 1500/2021
within a period of seven days as per the ratio laid down in the judgment of
Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. State of U. P, 2014 (2) SCC 1
Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the
respondent No.5-Senior Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch, Kashmir
to conclude the preliminary verification in the case bearing registration No.
PVK No.79/2021 expeditiously with a period of one month from the date of
receipt of this order. While doing so, respondent No. 5 shall accord due
consideration to all the facts and contentions raised by the petitioner in this
petition, whereafter an appropriate view independent of the views taken by
any other authority, shall be taken by the respondent No. 5-Crime Branch,
Kashmir. The petitioner shall provide a copy of this order along with a copy
of the petition to respondent No. 5 forthwith.
Disposed of as above.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge SRINAGAR 31.12.2021 "Aasif
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!