Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1585 j&K
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2021
Sr. No. 16
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WPC No. 4199/2019
CM No. 8688/2019
in
WP (C) No. 3502/2019
CM No. 7285/2019
Girdhari Lal and another .....Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Anil Verma, Advocate.
Vs
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir ..... Respondent(s)
and others
Through: Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate.
Mr. S.S. Nanda, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, JUDGE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN LAL, JUDGE
ORDER
02.12.2021
(OPEN COURT)
WP(C)No. 4199/2019 & WP (C) No. 3502/2019
Grievance of the petitioners in both the petitions, as urged at the time of hearing, appears to be that land belonging to the petitioners was acquired. However, compensation was paid only in regard to certain parcels while denying such compensation in regard to other parcels of land.
In view of the ratio of the Apex Court judgment in Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. The Industrial Development Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., and others, AIR 1997 SC 482, which clearly holds that writ jurisdiction will not be exercised post the passing of the award, we do not deem it appropriate to exercise writ jurisdiction in the present petitions, leaving the petitioners free to avail such other remedies as are available in accordance with the provisions of Land Acquisition Act.
Disposed of accordingly.
(Mohan Lal ) (Dhiraj Singh Thakur)
Judge Judge
Jammu
02.12.2021Naresh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!