Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 501 j&K
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2021
Sr. No.156
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 803/2021
CM(3454/2021)
(Through Video Conferencing)
Prinka Sharma and another
......Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Pawan Kumar Hans, Advocate
V/s
Union Territory of J and K and others
......Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE
JUDGMENT(ORAL)
1. Petitioners through the medium of instant petition, claim that they
being major have contracted the marriage out of their free will and are
living together as husband and wife, but are apprehensive of being
subjected to physical violence at the hands of respondents No. 5 and 6
as petitioner No. 1 has contracted the marriage against their wishes.
They seek protection and security cover from the official respondents.
2. Heard and perused the file. From the perusal of record annexed with
the writ petition, it reveals that petitioners are major and have
contracted the marriage according to Hindu Law, rites and customs.
3. Keeping in view the prayer made in the writ petition, I deem it proper
to dispose of the same at this stage itself by directing the official
respondents to provide adequate security cover to the petitioners and
act in accordance with the law laid down by the Apex Court in Lata Page 2 of 2 WP© No. 803/2021
Singh v. State of UP, (2006) 5 SCC 475. However, it is made clear
that if there is any FIR against the petitioners, in that eventuality,
Police may go ahead with the investigation, of course, under rules.
4. Disposed of along with connected CM(s).
(Tashi Rabstan) Judge Jammu 22.04.2021 Madan Verma-PS
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!