Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 469 j&K/2
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2021
S No. 201
After Notice
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT SRINAGAR
(THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE)
CrlM No. 210/2019
In CRMC No. 295/2017
Mohammad Maqbool Wani Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. R. A. Jan, Sr. Adv.
with Mr. Taha Khaleel, Adv.
Vs.
State of J&K and Ors. Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. B. A. Dar, Sr. AAG.
CORAM:-
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar, Judge.
(O R D E R) 22-04-2021
CrlM No. 210/2019
This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking recalling of
the order and judgment dated 27th September 2018 passed by this Court
in petition under Section 561-A Cr.PC No. 295/2017. The order dated
27th September 2018 has been sought to be recalled primarily on the
ground that this Court has not appreciated that the evidence collected by
the prosecution which culminated in the presentation of the chargesheet
before the trial court, even if taken to be correct on the face of it, did not
constitute ingredients of the offence alleged and that this Court did not
consider the chargesheet filed by the police before the trial court but
instead relied heavily on the status report filed by the respondents in the
AASIF GUL 2021.04.23 00:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CrlM No. 210/2019 Iin CRMC No. 295/2017
matter and therefore a serious miscarriage of justice was done to the
petitioner.
The application is opposed by Mr. B. A. Dar, learned Sr. AAG
vehemently. He submits that recall application moved by the petitioner
is under no provision of law and this Court while hearing recall
application cannot sit in an appeal over its own judgment.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record, I am of the view that the apprehension voiced by the learned
senior counsel appearing for the petitioner can be allayed by disposing
of this application without formally pronouncing on its maintainability.
Learned counsel for both the sides are ad idem that the observations
made by this Court in the order dated 27th September 2018 which is
sought to be recalled through these proceedings are restricted to the
disposal of 561-A petition No. 295/2017 earlier filed by the petitioner
and cannot be in any manner prejudice the rights of either side to be
determined in the trial before the trial court. The final report/chargesheet
has already been presented before the trial court and the matter shall now
come up before the trial court for framing of charge and it is at this stage,
the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all the pleas available to him
that may justify his discharge in a case.
In view of the above and without going into its maintainability, this
application is disposed of with an observation that nothing contained in
the judgment dated 27th September 2018 shall be construed as an
expression of opinion on the merits of the challan pending disposal
AASIF GUL 2021.04.23 00:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CrlM No. 210/2019 Iin CRMC No. 295/2017
before the trial court. It is made clear that the petitioner shall be free to
raise all available pleas before the trial court at the time of charge and
discharge and the same shall be considered by the trial court purely on
merits without being influenced in any manner by any of the observation
made in the order dated 27th September 2018 passed in 561-A Cr.PC No.
295/2017
CrlM disposed of.
(Sanjeev Kumar) Judge SRINAGAR 22.04.2021 "Aasif"
AASIF GUL 2021.04.23 00:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!