Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Beer Singh vs Guman Singh
2025 Latest Caselaw 947 HP

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 947 HP
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2025

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Beer Singh vs Guman Singh on 16 May, 2025

Author: Virender Singh
Bench: Virender Singh
                                                                   ( 2025:HHC:14533 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                                               Cr.Revision No.827 of 2024
                                               Decided on : 16.05.2025

Beer Singh                                                               ...Petitioner

                                          Versus

Guman Singh                                                            ...Respondent

Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1

For the petitioner                   :       Petitioner in person with Ms.
                                             Madhurika Sekhon Verma,
                                             Advocate.
For the respondent                   :       Respondent in person with Ms.
                                             Deepmala Sharma, Advocate.

Virender Singh, Judge (oral)

Petitioner­Beer Singh has filed the present

revision petition against the judgment dated 13.11.2024,

passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sirmaur at Nahan, H.P.

(hereinafter referred to as the 'Appellate Court'), in

Criminal Appeal No.70­Cr.A./10 of 2024, titled as Beer

Singh versus Guman Singh.

2. By way of judgment dated 13.11.2024, the

learned Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by

the petitioner against the judgment of conviction and order

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2 ( 2025:HHC:14533 )

of sentence dated 19.06.2024, passed by the Court of

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nahan, District Sirmaur,

H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the 'trial Court'), in

Complaint No.394/3 of 2021, titled as Guman Singh

versus Beer Singh.

3. Vide judgment of conviction and order of

sentence dated 19.06.2024, learned trial Court has

convicted the petitioner, for the offence, punishable under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter

referred to as the 'NI Act') and sentenced him to undergo

simple imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay

a compensation of Rs.7,00,000/­ to the complainant.

4. After dismissal of the appeal by the learned

Appellate Court, the present revision petition has been

preferred.

5. During the pendency of the present petition, the

parties have settled the matter. Thereafter, the petitioner

has filed application bearing Cr.MP No.1745 of 2025, for

permitting the parties to compound the offence, on the

ground that the matter has been settled between the

parties.

3 ( 2025:HHC:14533 )

6. Statement of both the parties have been

recorded, in which, they both have deposed that the

dispute with regard to Cheque No.204946, dated

15.11.2020, has been settled between the parties.

7. Today, the accused is present before this Court.

He has deposed that he has been convicted and sentenced

by the learned trial Court vide judgment of conviction and

order of sentence dated 19.06.2024.

8. Against the said judgment of conviction and

order of sentence, he had filed the appeal before the

learned Appellate Court and the learned Appellate Court

has also dismissed his appeal. Now, he is before this

Court, in the present revision petition.

9. In addition to this, the accused has also

submitted that during the pendency of the revision

petition, the matter has been compromised between him

and the complainant and he has also paid the settled

amount to the complainant.

10. The petitioner has also deposed that on the

basis of the said compromise, the present petition may

kindly be allowed by setting aside the judgment of 4 ( 2025:HHC:14533 )

conviction and order of sentence, referred to above, and he

may kindly be acquitted of the charge. He has also

deposed that he has deposited a sum of Rs.3,50,000/­,

before the learned trial Court.

11. In addition to this, the petitioner has also put

forward the indigent circumstances, by stating that a

lenient view may kindly be taken in the matter of

compounding fee.

12. Respondent has also made the similar

statement and has prayed that the amount deposited by

the petitioner before the learned trial Court, may kindly be

released, in favour of the respondent. He has also deposed

that he has no objection, in case the present petition is

allowed and the accused is acquitted by setting aside the

judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated

19.06.2024.

13. On the basis of the statements, so made by the

parties, one thing is clear that the matter has been settled

between the parties and in pursuance of the said

settlement, complainant has received the remaining

amount of compensation from the petitioner.

5 ( 2025:HHC:14533 )

14. According to the respondent­complainant, the

dispute with regard to Cheque No.204946 dated

15.11.2020, has been settled.

15. Since, the matter, with regard to cheque, in

question, has been settled between the parties, as such,

the application, bearing Cr.MP No.1745 of 2025, is allowed

and the parties are permitted to compound the offence.

16. Considering the fact that the application for

compounding of the offence has been allowed, the present

petition is allowed and the judgment of conviction and

order of sentence dated 19.06.2024, passed by learned trial

Court in Complaint No.394/3 of 2021, which has been

affirmed by learned Appellate Court, in Criminal Appeal

No.70­Cr.A./10 of 2024, vide judgment dated 13.11.2024,

are set aside and the petitioner is acquitted from the

offence, punishable under Section 138 NI Act. His personal

and surety bonds are discharged.

17. However, this order shall be, subject to deposit

of 6% of the cheque amount, as compounding fee, within

eight weeks from today. 50% of the compounding fee be

deposited with the Member Secretary, H.P. State Legal 6 ( 2025:HHC:14533 )

Services Authority, Shimla, and remaining 50% with the

H.P. High Court Staff Welfare Organization, Shimla.

18. It is further clarified that if the petitioner fails to

deposit the compounding fee, as ordered by this Court,

within two months, then, the present petition shall be

deemed to have been dismissed, by reviving the judgment

of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.06.2024,

passed by learned trial Court and in that eventuality, he

shall surrender before the learned trial Court to undergo

the substantive sentence, imposed upon him, by the

learned trial Court.

19. The amount deposited by the accused before

the learned trial Court is ordered to be released in favour of

complainant.

20. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any,

shall also stand disposed of.



                                         ( Virender Singh )
May 16, 2025 (ps)                              Judge
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter