Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 16193 HP
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2023
Sunder Singh Vs. Rajesh Kumar
.
Cr. Revision No. 546 of 2023
12.10.2023 Present: Mr. Dinendar Panwar, Advocate, for the
petitioner.
The petitioner has been convicted for the
offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable
Instruments Act in case No. 499-B of 2019, titled as,
'Rajesh Kumar versus Sunder Singh' by the Court of
learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. 3,
Shimla, (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial Court), vide
judgment dated 8.8.2022. Vide order of sentence dated
8.8.2022, he has been sentenced to undergo simple
imprisonment, for a period of six months and to pay
compensation double of the cheque amount viz. Rs.
98,890/-. In default, he has been sentenced to further
undergo simple imprisonment, for a period of two months.
2. The aforesaid judgment of conviction and
order of sentence has unsuccessfully been assailed by the
petitioner before the Court of learned Additional Sessions
Judge-I, Shimla (hereinafter referred to as 'the first
appellate Court') in criminal Appeal No. 56-S/10 of 2022,
vide judgment dated 8.8.2023.
3. Aggrieved from the judgment of conviction and
order of sentence, passed by the learned trial Court, as
referred to above, and affirmed by the learned First
Appellate Court, the petitioner has preferred the instant
.
revision petition.
Notice be issued to respondent, on steps being taken
within a week, returnable for 7.12.2023.
4. Notice be issued to respondent, on steps being
taken within a week, returnable for 7.12.2023.
5. Records of the learned trial Court, as well as,
the learned First Appellate Court be requisitioned for the
next date of hearing.
Cr. M.P. No. 3879 of 2023
6. By way of the present application, under
Section 397 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the
applicant has sought suspension of order of sentence,
dated 8.8.2022, passed by the learned trial Court, in
Criminal case No. 499-B of 2019, and affirmed by the
learned First Appellate Court in Criminal Appeal No. 56-
S/10 of 2022, vide judgment dated 8.8.2023.
7. Since, the revision against the judgment of
conviction and order of sentence, as referred to herein-
above, will take sufficient long time, for its disposal, as
such, the order of sentence is suspended during the
pendency of the revision, subject to the following conditions:
(i) That the applicant shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/-, alongwith one surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks from today, with an undertaking that in the event of final dismissal of the
revision petition, he will surrender before the learned trial Court to serve the remainder substantive sentence;
.
(ii) That the applicant shall deposit 40% of the cheque
amount, which shall be in addition to the amount already deposited by the applicant, before the learned trial Court,
within a period of four weeks from today.
8. The application is, thus, disposed of.
9. A copy of this order be sent to the learned trial
Court, with the direction that the report of compliance of
this order be submitted to this Court, on or before the next
date of hearing.
(Virender Singh) Judge
October 12, 2023 (kalpana)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!