Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5657 HP
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No.443 of 2023
Decided on 11th May, 2023
Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioners
.
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Jitender Sharma, Mr. Tejasvi Sharma,
Mr. Baldev Negi and Mr. Pushpinder Singh
Jaswal, Additional Advocates General, with
Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate
r General, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate, for
respondent No.4.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have prayed for quashing
of FIR No.137 of 2015, dated 27.07.2015, registered under Sections
451, 147, 149, 323, 427, 504, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code,
at Police Station Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well
as learned Additional Advocate General.
3. Respondent No. 4, Mr. Sarvjeet Singh, who is present in
person in the Court, has been duly identified by his counsel Mr.
Virender Kumar, Advocate. His statement has also been
independently recorded in the Court, wherein he has stated that he
is not interested in pursuing the matter which led to registration of
FIR No.137 of 2015, dated 27.07.2015, registered under Sections
.
451, 147, 149, 323, 427, 504, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code
at Police Station Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.
4. Learned Additional Advocate General has also very
fairly submitted that the respondent-State has no objection in case
petition is allowed and FIR in issue as well as ensuing criminal
proceedings are quashed and set aside.
5. rAccordingly, in view of the above, this petition is allowed
and FIR No.137 of 2015, dated 27.07.2015, registered under
Sections 451, 147, 149, 323, 427, 504, 201 and 34 of the Indian
Penal Code at Police Station Palampur, District Kangra, H.P., are
quashed and set aside, taking into consideration the statement to
this effect made by respondent No. 4 in this Court. The statement of
the complainant/respondent No. 4 made today in the Court shall
form part of the judgment. Miscellaneous applications, if any, also
stand disposed of.
Downloaded copy of this judgment is valid for
compliance.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
May 11, 2023 (Vinod)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!