Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5155 HP
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No.2513 of 2023
.
Date of Decision: May 04, 2023.
Pratap Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
..Respondents
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner : Ms. Arun Kaushal, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate No. 1 and 2. General.
Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge(Oral)
Petitioner is serving as Radiographer in Health
Department, Government of Himachal Pradesh.
2. Petitioner has approached this Court against his
transfer order dated 28.04.2023, whereby he has been
transferred from CHC Padhar, District Mandi, H.P., to CHC Chandi,
District Solan, H.P., vice respondent No.3.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that son of petitioner is 75% disabled person and being
a special child, he requires special care and as per policy of the
.
State, concession for posting the parents of such child are
available/providing posting in and around the home station.
Whereas, the petitioner has been transferred without taking into
consideration the policy of the State Government as well as
Transfer Policy, only in order to accommodate the respondent
No.3 that too on the basis of DO Note.
4. It has been further submitted by learned counsel for
the petitioner that petitioner shall be satisfied, in case he is
permitted to represent to respondent No.2, i.e. Director Health
Services, H.P., with further directions to decide the
representation, in a time bound manner.
5. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that
keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances, disability of
the child of the petitioner, in case, representation is made by the
petitioner, his case shall be considered sympathetically, in terms
of the policy of the State Government.
6. In view of above, petitioner is permitted and directed
to represent to respondent No.2, on or before 08.05.2023 and in
case, such representation preferred by the petitioner, the same
shall be decided by respondent No. 2 on or before 15.05.2022 by
speaking and reasoned order, after giving opportunity of hearing,
if desired so.
7. Needless to say, order passed by the competent
authority shall be communicated to the petitioner immediately
thereafter.
.
8. Till the date decision is taken by respondent No.2,
Director Health Services, Himachal Pradesh, the impugned order
dated 28.04.2023 shall remained stayed.
9. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of, so also the
pending application(s) if any.
Petitioner is permitted to produce a copy of this
judgment, downloaded from the web-page of the High Court of
Himachal Pradesh, before the Reference Court/authorities
concerned, and said Court/authorities shall not insist for
production of a certified copy but if required, passing of order can
be verified from Website of the High Court or otherwise.
(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.
(Sushil Kukreja) Judge.
May 04, 2023 (subhash)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!