Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8775 HP
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2022
OIC Vs. Geeta Devi & ors.
.
FAO No. 302/2017 a/w C.O. No. 15/2017
21.10.2022 Present: Mr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant(s).
Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Ms. Godawari, Advocate, vice Mr. Vijay K. Arora, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP No. 4900/2022 in FAO No. 302/2017
By medium of this application, the applicant-
respondent No.1 has sought permission to re-examine PW-6 and
the same has been filed under Order XLI Rule 27(1)(b) CPC, which
reads as under:-
"(b) the Appellate Court requires any document to be produced or any witness to be examined to enable it to
pronounce judgment, or for any other substantial cause, the Appellate Court may allow such evidence or document to be
produced, or witness to be examined".
Having gone through the material already available
on record, this Court does not require re-examination of PW-6 as
there is sufficient material available on record to pronounce the
judgment. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 21.10.2022 (pankaj)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!