Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16 HP
Judgement Date : 1 January, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.6440 of 2020
.
Decided on: 1st January, 2021
__________________________________________________________________
Harsh Lata
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
......Respondents
__________________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge
The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting?
______________________________________________________
For the petitioner: Ms. Srishti Chauhan, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General,
with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Vikas
Rathore & Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans,
Additional Advocates General and
Ms. Seema Sharma, Mr. Bhupinder
Thakur & Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur,
Deputy Advocates General, for
respondent No.1-State.
Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.
(Through Video Conferencing)
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
The instant writ petition has been filed by the
petitioner for the grant of following substantive reliefs:-
"i) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent number 2 to declare the result of the petitioner i.e. Annexure P-7.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
implement the order passed in CWP No.849 of 2019 i.e. Annexure P-8 qua the petitioner thereby declaring the result of the petitioner."
.
2. Admittedly, the petitioner has passed her
matriculation examination in August, 2018 (24.08.2018), as
per Annexure P-4, from "Grameen Mukt Vidhyalayi Shikshan
Sansthan". The only hurdle in not declaring the result of the
petitioner is on account of non-recognition of Grameen Mukt
Vidhyalayi Shikshan Sansthan with the Himachal Pradesh
Board of School Education, i.e. respondent No.2 herein.
3. However, similar issue came up before this Court
in CWP No.849 of 2019, titled Priyanka Devi vs. State of
H.P. and others, decided on 10.09.2019, wherein learned
Standing Counsel for respondent No.2-Board had placed on
record written instructions, which revealed that during the
period from 01.12.2017 to 05.02.2019, "Grameen Mukt
Vidhyalayi Shikshan Sansthan", i.e. respondent No.3, was
duly recognized with the Himachal Pradesh Board of School
Education, i.e. respondent No.2.
4. Therefore, once the petitioner has appeared for
matriculation examination during the period when Grameen
Mukt Vidhyalayi Shikshan Sansthan was recognized by
respondent No.2, the petitioner was rightly admitted in 10+2
examination by respondent No.2.
.
5. Therefore, in such circumstances, there is no
impediment in not declaring the result of the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is allowed
and respondent No.2 is directed to declare the result of the
petitioner for 10+2 examination, within a period of two weeks
from today.
7. to The instant writ petition stands disposed of in the
aforesaid terms, so also the pending application(s), if any.
Copy dasti.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge January 01, 2021 (V.Himalvi/Mukesh)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!