Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1309 HP
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
.
CWP No.1030 of 2021
Decided on: 25th February, 2021
__________________________________________________________________
Ramesh Kumar
....Petitioner.
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation
......Respondent.
__________________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath, Judge.
1 Whether approved for reporting?
______________________________________________________
For the petitioner: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate.
For the respondent: Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate.
L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice (Oral)
Notice. Ms. Shubh Mahajan, learned counsel,
appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of the
respondent.
2. The writ petition is filed with the following
prayers:-
(a) "That the respondent Corporation may kindly be directed to release the amount(s) of death-cum- retirement gratuity, leave encashment, amount of Group Insurance and arrear of dearness allowance to
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
the petitioner immediately or within a time bound manner alongwith interest @ 12% per annum.
.
(b) That the respondent may kindly be directed to pay interest at the rate of 12% per annum w.e.f. 01.06.2019 on the arrear of amount of pension and
amount of commutation aforesaid alongwith interest @12% per annum since 01.06.2019 to December, 2019."
3. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered
in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in
CWP No.3050/2014, titled as Nek Ram Versus State of
Himachal Pradesh & others, decided on 17.7.2014.
Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate, representing the
respondent, concedes that the petitioner is entitled to the
relief prayed for, in view of the judgment of this Court in
Nek Ram's case supra. If that be so, similar treatment be
extended to the petitioner herein also as to the petitioner in
the above referred decision, in case the petitioner is also
similarly situated, within a period of three months from the
date of production of a copy of this judgment alongwith a
copy of the writ petition and copy of the judgment referred
to above, by the petitioner before the respondent.
4. With these observations, the writ petition stands
.
disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(L. Narayana Swamy)
Chief Justice
(Ravi Malimath) Judge February 25, 2021 (Bhardwaj)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!