Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

In I &Ph Division Padhar vs The State Of Hiamchal
2021 Latest Caselaw 3926 HP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3926 HP
Judgement Date : 13 August, 2021

Himachal Pradesh High Court
In I &Ph Division Padhar vs The State Of Hiamchal on 13 August, 2021
Bench: Sureshwar Thakur
                                  Reportable
                             Reserved on:- 11th August, 2021.

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
                   ON THE        13th   DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
                             BEFORE




                                                            .
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR





          CIVIL WRIT PETITION (ORIGINAL APPLICATION)
                          No. 7259 of 2019.





    Between:-
     PIYAR CHAND SON OF
     SHRI SANT RAM, RESIDENT OF




     BALAKRUPI, P.O. JALPEHAR,
     TEHSIL JOGINDERNAGAR,

     DISTRICT MANDI, H.P.,

     PRESENTLY WORKING AS
     AS A WATER WORKS CLERK/
     IRRIGATION BOOKING CLERK



     IN I &PH DIVISION PADHAR,
     DISTRICT MANDI, HP.




                                                  ....PETITIONER.





           (BY A.K. GUPTA, ADVOCATE)





           AND


     1.    THE    STATE     OF     HIAMCHAL
           PRADESH        THROUGH              ITS
           PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (I&PH)
           WITH     HEADQUATERS                AT
           SHIMLA-2, H.P.




                                           ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 22:52:27 :::CIS
                                     ...2...




                                                               .

         2.   THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, I&PH
              WITH HEADQUATERS AT U.S.





              CLUB, SHIMLA-1.
         3.   THE SUPERINTENDING
              ENGINEER, I&PH, CIRCLE





              SUNDERNAGAR, DISTRICT
              MANDI, H.P.
         4.   THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

              I&PH       DIVISION,       PADHAR,

              DISTRICT MANDI, H.P.
    5.        THE SECRETARY (FINANCE) TO


              THE        GOVERNMENT               OF
              HIAMCHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA-




              2.
                                                    ....RESPONDENTS.





              (BY MR. ASHWANI SHARMA,
              ADDITIONAL              ADVOCATE





              GENERAL )


                   This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court
    passed the following:-
                              JUDGMENT

...3...

.

Through an office order, borne in Annexure P-1, the

daily wage service of, the, petitioner as Irrigation Book Clerk became

reqularised w.e.f. 1.1.1994. Since, the respondent contends that the

services of the writ petitioner became regularized, as, Irrigation

Booking Clerk (Patwari) w.e.f. 1.1.1994, thereupon, they contend that

r to the petitioner's designation is co-equivalent to that of a junior

technician. They further contend, that the benefits of enhanced pay

scale and grade pay as spelt in Annexure R-1, vis-a-vis, any Junior

Technician, and, as became purveyed to the writ petitioner, is/are,

tenable and legally infallible.

2. Even though, the respondents in their reply to the writ

petition, did not contest that the services of the writ petitioner,

became regularized as Irrigation Booking Clerk, w.e.f. 1.1.1994, yet

they contend that the regularization of the writ petitioner, was made,

against the post of Irrigation Booking Clerk (Patwari), and, that his

services were not regularised as a Complaint Clerk. However, the

afore created confusion with respect to the designation of the post,

whereagainst the writ petitioner became regularized hence

...4...

.

uncontro-vertedly w.e.f. 1.1.1994, inasmuch, as, whether he became

regularised as Clerk or as Irrigation Booking Clerk (Patwari), rather

does become completely evaporated from a closest discerning being

made from Annexure P-1. Annexure P-1 is an order of regularization

of the writ petitioner, wherein rather a recital is carried, that the

Irrigation Booking Clerk.

services of the writ petitioner became regularised against the post of

Therefore, the bracketed addition thereto

of (Patwari) by the respondents to his post of Irrigation Booking

Clerk, and, to hence draw parity inter se the afore, with that of any

Junior Technician, and, consequently to deprive him, from the benefit

of escalated pay scale and grade pay, as available to Clerks, post

whereof becomes carried in Column No.15 of Annexure R-1, rather

is a palpable sheer contrivance and a stratagem deployed, by the

respondents, to rid of all legal effects, the uncontested narrations,

carried in Annexure P-1, and, the ones carried in column No.15 of

Annexure R-1, wherein, vis-a-vis, Clerks, an escalated pay band, and,

also escalated grade pay becomes prescribed.

...5...

.

3. Therefore, this Court discoutenances, the stand in

opposition as projected by the respondents, to the writ claim.

Contrarily this Court orders that the writ petitioner be construed to be

a Clerk on the Regular establishment of the respondents. In sequel,

this Court directs that the benefits as occur in column 15 of Annexure

r to R-1, be purveyed to the petitioner w.e.f. from 27.09.2012, uptil now,

along with leviable interest thereon, rather by the respondents.

Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. All pending applications

also stand disposed of.

(Sureshwar Thakur)

Judge 13th August, 2021.

(jai)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter