Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3512 HP
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. MP(M) No. 1304 of 2021
Date of Decision: 04.08.2021
.
______________________________________________________________________
Sh. Jagdish Kumar ....Petitioner.
Vs.
State of Himachal Pradesh .....Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the petitioner: Mr. Vivek Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondent: M/s Sumesh Raj, Adarsh Sharma &
r Sanjeev Sood, Additional Advocate
Generals, with M/s J.S. Guleria & Kamal
Kant Chandel, Deputy Advocate
Generals.
Petitioner is present in person.
(Through Video Conference)
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral):
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also
gone through the status report.
2. It is not in dispute that after the grant of bail, the
petitioner has duly participated in the course of investigation and has not
created any hindrance in the same. It is further not the allegation of the
prosecution that in the interregnum, post grant of anticipatory bail, the
petitioner has either tried to influence any witness or has created any
other impediment in the course of investigation.
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
3. In view of the above, this petition is allowed and order
dated 13.07.2021, passed in FIR No. 14 of 2021, registered under
Sections 323, 354, 504, 379 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal
.
Code at Women Police Station, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P. is
made absolute, subject to the following conditions:
"i) Petitioner shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/ with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned
Trial Court within a period of two weeks from today.
(ii) He shall make himself available for
the purpose of interrogation, if so required and
regularly attend the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and if prevented by any reason to do so, seek exemption from appearance by filing
appropriate application;
iii) He shall not tamper with the
prosecution evidence nor hamper the
investigation of the case in any manner
whatsoever.
iv) He shall not make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or the Police Officer; and
v) He shall not leave the territory of India without prior permission of the Court."
4. It is clarified that findings which have been returned by
this Court while deciding this petition are only for the purpose of
adjudication of the present bail application and learned trial Court shall
not be influenced by any of the findings so returned by this Court in the
adjudication of this petition during the trial of the case. It is further
.
clarified that in case the petitioner does not comply with the conditions
which have been imposed upon him while granting the present bail, the
State shall be at liberty to approach this Court for the cancellation of the
bail. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
Copy dasti.
August 04, 2021
(bhupender)
r to (Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!