Unknown vs Smt. Kumad Singh &
2021 Latest Caselaw 3381 HP

of 2020.

02.08.2021 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for respondents.

Through Video-Conferencing

CMP No. 4699 of 2021

By way of instant application, prayer has been

made on behalf of applicant/petitioner for revival of the COPC

No.245 of 2020 titled as Het Ram Vs. Smt. Kumad Singh &

another, which was disposed of vide judgment dated

25.02.2021, passed by this Court.

Aforesaid contempt petition came to be disposed of

on the basis of undertaking given by Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate,

learned counsel representing the respondents that judgment

alleged to have been violated, shall be positively implemented

within a period four weeks, if not already implemented. But

since despite having aforesaid undertaking given to this Court,

nothing has been done by respondents, applicant/petitioner

approached this Court by way of present application for revival

of the proceedings.

Mr. Naresh Kual, learned counsel representing the

respondents, prays for and is granted two weeks' time to

implement the order/judgment dated 25.02.2021, passed by this

Court in COPC No. 245 of 2020, titled as Het Ram vs. Smt.

Kumad Singh & another, failing which respondent No.1.

Managing Director, Tourism Development Corporation, Ritz

.

Annexe, Shimla-171001, shall remain present in the Court on the

next date of hearing.

List on 16th August, 2021.

                                           (Sandeep Sharma)
    August 2, 2021                             Judge
       (ravinder)











                                   .