Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3340 HP
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 4232 of 2021
.
Decided on: August 2, 2021
____________________________________________________________
Shashi Kala Sharma ...Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others ...Respondents.
____________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting1?
____________________________________________________________
For the petitioner :Mr. Suneel Awasthi, Advocate.
For the respondents :Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General
with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Hemanshu Mishra,
Additional Advocate Generals for the
respondents.
____________________________________
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions
states that his client would be satisfied in case respondents are
directed to decide her representation annexure P5 dated
27.03.2021 within a time bound manner. Obviously, there cannot be
any objection to such a genuine prayer.
2. In such circumstances, we dispose of the instant writ
petition by directing the respondents to consider and decide, after
hearing both the parties, the representation(s) made by the
Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? .
petitioner, within a period of 15 days from today by passing a
speaking order. It is also made clear that these directions may not
.
be treated as precedent in future. Pending application(s), if any,
also stands disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
2nd August, 2021
r to ( Satyen Vaidya )
Judge
tm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!