Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Laxmanbhai Rukhadbhai Rathod (Name As ... vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1761 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1761 Guj
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Laxmanbhai Rukhadbhai Rathod (Name As ... vs State Of Gujarat on 30 March, 2026

                                                                                                               NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/7326/2026                                    ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

                                                                                                                undefined




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                              R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                          CHARGESHEET) NO. 7326 of 2026

                        ==========================================================
                        LAXMANBHAI RUKHADBHAI RATHOD (NAME AS PER SESSIONS COURT
                                                 ORDER)
                                                  Versus
                                           STATE OF GUJARAT
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR S D MOGHARIYA(11273) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MR KRUTIK PARIKH, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
                        No. 1
                        ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                                DESAI

                                                              Date : 30/03/2026

                                                               ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on

behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

11189003252092 of 2025 registered with A Division Morbi City

Police Station, Morbi, for the offence punishable under Sections

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7326/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

316(5), 318(4), 61(2), 54, 317(2) of the BNS.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of

the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular

bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed,

further incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the

Investigation Officer in any manner. It is further contended that,

the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions

that may be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking

to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may

not exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the

application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7326/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

(i). The applicant is a permanent resident of District:Morbi,

hence would be available at the time of trial;

(ii). As of now, the applicant does not have any criminal

antecedents.

(iii). The applicant was friend of accused no.1- Bharat

Parshottambhai Barad.

(iv). It was the accused no.1-Bharat Parshottambhai Barad

who had deposited Rs.5,20,000/- in the bank account of

the applicant with the Citizen Co-operative Bank, Morbi

which was withdrawn by the applicant and handed over to

the main accused-Bharat Parshottambhai Barad, for which

the applicant received a commission of Rs.4,000/-.

(v). The Co-accused Sumit Govindbhai Chauhan whose

role is akin to that of the applicant has been considered

for regular bail vide order passed in Cr.Ma No.7236 of

2026 on 27.03.2026.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down

by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v.

Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7326/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering

the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the

First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in

detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit

case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on

regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on bail in connection with FIR being C.R.

No. 11189003252092 of 2025 registered with A Division Morbi

City Police Station, Morbi, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like

amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the

conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file

an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7326/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O.

and also to the Court at the time of execution of the

bond and shall not change his residence without

prior intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark presence on every Monday before the concerned

police station for one year.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being.

If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the

Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate

action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the competent court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above

conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced

by any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature,

made at this stage only for the purpose of enlarging the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7326/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) Vikramsinh Amarsinh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter