Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sureshbhai Ramchand Tolani vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1717 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1717 Guj
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Sureshbhai Ramchand Tolani vs State Of Gujarat on 27 March, 2026

                                                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/6605/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026

                                                                                                                  undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                              R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                          CHARGESHEET) NO. 6605 of 2026

                        ==========================================================
                                                     SURESHBHAI RAMCHAND TOLANI
                                                                Versus
                                                          STATE OF GUJARAT
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR P P MAJMUDAR(5284) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                        MR.KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                        MR.L.V.PATEL, ADVOCATE for MR.R.J.GOSWAMI, ADVOCATE for the
                        Complainant
                        ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                                DESAI

                                                           Date : 27/03/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 06 of 2025 registered

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6605/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026

undefined

with Vadodara City A.C.B. Police Station, Vadodara, for

the offence punishable under Sections 7A of the

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (Amendment, 2018).

4. Heard learned advocate Mr.P.P.Majmudar on behalf

of the applicant who has submitted that the investigation

is over and charge-sheet has been filed. Hence, further

incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the

Investigating Officer in any manner. The applicant is

ready and willing to abide by any condition which may be

imposed by this Court, if released on bail. Mr.Majmudar

further submitted that the offense against the applicant

would be under Sections 7A of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 (Amendment, 2018), and in absence

of any public servant being implicated, the said offense

against the applicant who is not a public servant, will not

hold good. Accordingly, Mr.Majmudar has urged to allow

the application and release the applicant on bail subject

to necessary conditions. Learned advocate Mr.Majmudar,

upon instructions, has submitted that the applicant would

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6605/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026

undefined

remain present before the FSL, Gandhinagar, for his

voice spectrography test.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming

out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise

discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

6. Learned advocate Mr.L.V.Patel appearing for

Mr.R.J.Goswami learned advocate for the original

complainant has drawn the attention of the Court towards

the affidavit filed by the son of the original complainant,

whereby, the present bail application has been strongly

opposed by him. Mr.Patel has submitted that though it

was P.I. Mr.Vasava of Varasiya Police Station who had

demanded the bribe of Rs.5 lakhs, the Investigating

Officer has not made him an accused and instead shown

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6605/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026

undefined

him as a prosecution witness. Mr.Patel has drawn the

attention of the Court towards the averments of para 9 of

the affidavit of the original complainant's son, wherein, it

has been mentioned that P.I. Mr.S.M.Vasava was the

accused in the offense and ought to have been arrested

by the Investigating Officer, however, has not done so

and instead, has shown him as prosecution witness.

Accordingly, Mr.Patel has urged this Court to reject this

bail application.

7. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Vadodara,

hence would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The applicant does not have any criminal

antecedents.

iii. No further recovery or discovery is to be affected

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6605/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026

undefined

from the applicant.

iv. The original complainant is at liberty to redress his

grievance as regards PI of Varasiya Police Station

Mr.S.M.Vasava's alleged involvement in the offense,

before the appropriate forum.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6605/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026

undefined

applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection

with FIR being C.R. No. 06 of 2025 registered with

Vadodara City A.C.B. Police Station, Vadodara, on

executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the

satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the

conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within

a week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall

file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior

permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of

the bond and shall not change his residence without

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6605/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026

undefined

prior intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark presence on every Monday before the

concerned police station for one year.

[g] upon being summoned by the Investigating Officer,

shall co-operate and remain present before the FSL,

Gandhinagar, for rendering his voice samples for voice

spectrography test, without fail.

10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be free to

take appropriate action in the matter.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions in accordance with law.

12. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6605/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026

undefined

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct

service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANKIT SHAH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter