Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Harshadbhai Hemrajbhai Desai vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1660 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1660 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Harshadbhai Hemrajbhai Desai vs State Of Gujarat on 25 March, 2026

Author: Nikhil S. Kariel
Bench: Nikhil S. Kariel
                                                                                                            NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/5557/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 25/03/2026

                                                                                                            undefined




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
                                   AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 5557 of 2026

                     ==========================================================
                                               HARSHADBHAI HEMRAJBHAI DESAI
                                                          Versus
                                                    STATE OF GUJARAT
                     ==========================================================
                     Appearance:
                     MR KISHAN R CHAKWAWALA(9846) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                     MR RM CHAKWAWALA(1519) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                     MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                     ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                                         Date : 25/03/2026
                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Kishan Chakwawala appearing on

behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.

Parikh appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on

Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11213022250775 of

2025 registered with Jetpur City Police Station, District Rajkot Rural, for

the offence punishable under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 61(2), 54 and

317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/5557/2026 ORDER DATED: 25/03/2026

undefined

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that considering

the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled,

the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that

since the charge-sheet is filed, no useful purpose would be served by

keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended

that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that

may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to the grant

of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to the nature of

offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from

the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of

the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. Allegation being that the accused had laundered money through the

medium of mule accounts, more particularly the amounts laundered

being proceeds of cyber crime.

ii. The allegation being the accused Nos. 1 to 7 being bank account

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/5557/2026 ORDER DATED: 25/03/2026

undefined

holders had coordinated with the accused No. 8, and the present

applicant and whereas it would appear that the accused were getting

commission at the rate of 1% i.e. the mule account holders, and the

applicant getting some higher commission.

iii. Though prima facie it would appear that the present applicant was

aware about the fact of the money being proceeds of crime, yet,

considering the fact that the applicant is in custody since 14.12.2025,

the charge-sheet having been filed and there being only eight

complaints in the NCCRP Portal and also considering that the

amounts are not proceeds of digital arrests, this Court is inclined to

consider the present application.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau

of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the

nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First

Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima

facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/5557/2026 ORDER DATED: 25/03/2026

undefined

to be released on bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

11213022250775 of 2025 registered with Jetpur City Police Station,

District Rajkot Rural, on executing a bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One

Lakh only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the

trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the

Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the

Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the

residence without prior intimation to the I.O.;

[f] mark presence once a fortnight for a period of six months and

thereafter once a month for a period of six months before the

concerned police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required

in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any

of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/5557/2026 ORDER DATED: 25/03/2026

undefined

be free to take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction

to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify

and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any

observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this

stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicant

for being released on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made

absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.

(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) BDSONGARA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter