Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashish Prabodhbhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1605 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1605 Guj
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2026

[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Ashish Prabodhbhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat on 24 March, 2026

                                                                                                                 NEUTRAL CITATION




                           R/CR.MA/6722/2026                                       ORDER DATED: 24/03/2026

                                                                                                                 undefined




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 6722 of
                                                  2026
                                                  With
                               R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 6739 of 2026
                     ==========================================================
                                                ASHISH PRABODHBHAI SHAH
                                                          Versus
                                                 STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                     ==========================================================
                     Appearance:
                     MR. AYAN I MANSURI(17271) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                     YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                     ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

                                                         Date : 24/03/2026

                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. The present Applications are filed by the Applicant for temporary bail for 30 days in connection with FIR No. 11215002220264/22 and FIR No. 11191045240411/2024 for the offence under Section 420,465,468,466,471 of IPC and Section 66-C of the IT Act as well as Section 193,196,465,467,468,471 of IPC respectively.

2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is not keeping well and needs treatment more particularly for uncontrolled diabetes, complications with regard to kidney failure, suspected cancerous HPV Infection and thus, prayed for enlarging the Applicant on bail.

2.1 Learned Advocate for the Applicant further submits that there is no continuous medical treatment provided to the present Applicant and thus, wants to be treated in private hospital.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6722/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2026

undefined

3. Per contra, learned APP for the Respondent State submits that the Applicant has forged the order of parole leave of this Court as well as death certificate. It transpires from the impugned order dated 05.03.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 599/2026 by the 2 nd Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad rejecting the temporary bail application that he has denied for medical treatment and also transpires that the medical papers dated 17.05.2025 reflect that the applicant has provided medication and no complaint with regard to blood vomiting seen from the medical papers. Thus, argued to reject the present Applications.

4. Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties. The present Applicant is facing serious charge of forging the parole order of this Court as well as death certificate. The Applicant was apprehended by the Police Authority after 393 days while he was on parole leave. It is also reflecting from the order dated 05.03.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 599/2026 by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad seeking temporary bail, with regards to FIR bearing No. 1119104524011/2011 dated 02.07.2024 that the present applicant has refused to admit in the hospital for better medical treatment and has also given a statement to that effect.

5. Considering the same, it cannot be said that the Applicant has a statutory right of being treated at the hospital as per his choice when he is an under trial prisoner, more particularly, when he refused for admission solely for the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6722/2026 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2026

undefined

purpose to see that he gets out from the custody under the pretext of private medical treatment. It is also evident from the impugned order dated 05.03.2026 that the Applicant has no complaint of blood vomiting.

6. In view of the above, no case is made out, more particularly when the Applicant is transferred from Anand Jail to Vadodara jail for better treatment, and after having refused to such treatment, cannot claim that he as a matter of right to be treated in private hospital as per his choice under the pretext of deteriorating medical condition. Under the facts and circumstances of the case, present applications stand rejected. It is made clear that the applicant may be given medical treatment as and when required by the jail authorities including admission in the hospital if required.

(P. M. RAVAL, J) MMP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter