Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mansukhbhai Dhanjibhai Parmar (Name As ... vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1436 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1436 Guj
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Mansukhbhai Dhanjibhai Parmar (Name As ... vs State Of Gujarat on 18 March, 2026

                                                                                                        NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/6549/2026                              ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

                                                                                                         undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                        CHARGESHEET) NO. 6549 of 2026

                      ==========================================================
                           MANSUKHBHAI DHANJIBHAI PARMAR (NAME AS PER SESSIONS
                                              COURT ORDER)
                                                  Versus
                                           STATE OF GUJARAT
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR S D MOGHARIYA(11273) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR. KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                       Date : 18/03/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned APP appearing on behalf of the

respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

11189003251984 of 2025 registered with A Division Morbi City

Police Station, Morbi for the offence punishable under Sections

61(2), 319, 337, 338, 340(2) of the BNS, 2023.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6549/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of

the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular

bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed,

further incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the

Investigation Officer in any manner. It is further contended that,

the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions

that may be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking

to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may

not exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the

application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Morbi, hence

would be available at the time of trial;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6549/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

ii. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents;

iii. The applicant though has three antecedents against him

only one pertains to offence under the BNS, 2023 of identical

nature;

iv. The allegation against the applicant is about he had been

entered into conspiracy with the other co-accused whereby

the co-accused Darshit having prepared the forged aadhar

card and pan card of the original owner of the land namely

Talshibhai Bhagwanji father of the complainant.

v. Before the alleged sale deed could be executed the

accused no. 1 Amitbhai was apprehended and after two days

the present applicant came to be apprehended.

vi. The land in question is in possession of the original owner

as on today.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down

by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v.

Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6549/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the

First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in

detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit

case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on

regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered

as C.R. No. 11189003251984 of 2025 registered with 'A' Division

Morbi City Police Station, Morbi, on executing a bail bond of

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety

of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and

subject to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6549/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

[d] not to leave the geographical limits of District Morbi

without prior permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O. and

the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and

the court;

[f] mark presence on every Wednesday before the concerned

police station till the completion of trail.

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for

which, he shall file affidavits before the concerned court and

the police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being.

If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the

Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate

action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned

Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions

in accordance with law.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6549/2026 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

11. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANIRUDH OJHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter