Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shaileshbhai Ramjibhai Aal vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1400 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1400 Guj
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2026

[Cites 20, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Shaileshbhai Ramjibhai Aal vs State Of Gujarat on 18 March, 2026

                                                                                                           NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/CR.MA/14861/2025                             ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

                                                                                                           undefined




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                             R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO.
                                                   14861 of 2025

                        ==========================================================
                                                SHAILESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI AAL & ORS.
                                                              Versus
                                                     STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                        ==========================================================
                        Appearance:
                        MR MAHESH PUJARA, LD.ADVOCATE WITH MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203)
                        for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
                        MR MANAN MAHETA, LD.ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
                        Respondent(s) No. 1
                        ==========================================================

                             CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS

                                                         Date : 18/03/2026

                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. Learned advocate Mr.Abhishek Khuman appears and submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondent no.2 - original complainant. He is permitted to file his appearance. Registry shall accept his vakalatnama.

2. By way of preferring the present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicants- original accused seek to invoke the inherent powers of this Court, praying to quash and set- aside the First Information Report being C.R.No.I- 44 of 2018 registered with the Wankaner City Police Station, Morbi, for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 325, 324, 354, 323, 427, 447, 504, 506(2), 143, 147, 148,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/14861/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

149 of Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the G.P.Act, the Charge Sheet and Sessions Case No.33 of 2019 pending before the learned Sessions Court, Morbi as well as all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto.

3. Today, when the matter is called out, the original complainant and the victims, who are personally present before this Court, have produced their identity proofs as well as the affidavits, which are ordered to be taken on record. In the said affidavits, the complainant and the victims have categorically stated that with the intervention of the friends, family members and community people, the dispute between them and the applicants- accused has been amicably resolved and there is no ill-will or any grievance amongst them. Therefore, they do not want to proceed further with the matter qua the present applicants.

4. Considering the issue involved in the present application as well as considering the fact that the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties, with the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the present application is taken up for final disposal.

5. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned APP Mr.Manan Maheta waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.1 - State and learned advocate

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/14861/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

Mr.Abhishek Khuman waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.2 - complainant.

6. Learned advocate for the applicants-accused has submitted that since the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties, the application may be allowed and the impugned FIR as well as the proceedings of the criminal case may be quashed and set-aside.

7. The original complainant and the victim, who are present in the Court, have categorically stated before this Court that they have no objection if the application is allowed and the impugned FIR is quashed and set-aside. Thus, it appears from the aforesaid that sending the applicants-accused to face the trial would be nothing but a futile exercise and would amount to abuse of process of law.

8. The relevant paragraphs of the affidavit of the original complainant, read thus :

"1. I say and submit that being the complainant, I'm aware about the facts and circumstances of the present case, hence filing present affidavit in support of averments in present application.

2.I submit that I've filed an F.I.R on 11.07.2018 with Wankaner city Police Station, Morbi being CR. no. 1- 44 of 2018 against the applicants for the offenses under sections 307, 326, 325, 324, 354, 323, 427,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/14861/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

447, 504, 506(2), 143, 147, 148 and 149 of Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of Gujarat Police Act.

3. I say that the dispute amongst us came to be resolved amicably and peacefully and the on account of misconception of facts the F.I.R came to be filed for which now no grievance exists against each other. I say that as in fact F.I.R in question which is filed may not continue in view of resolutions of the dispute amongst us and therefore the prayer as prayed for may kindly be accepted in the facts and circumstances of the present case, under these set of circumstances, if the Hon'ble Court pleased to terminate the proceeding as prayed for by the applicants by quashing and setting aside the F.I.R being CR No. 1-44 of 2018 filed before Wankaner city Police Station, Morbi, Sessions Case No. 33 of 2019 pending before the Sessions Court, Morbi as well as further proceedings arising thereof, I've no objection."

9. The relevant paragraphs of the affidavits of the victims, namely, Khushbuben Samirbhai Keda and Madinaben Arifbhai Bambhaniya, read thus :

"1. I say and submit that being the victim of the present case, I'm aware about the facts and circumstances of the present case, hence filing present affidavit in support of averments in present application.

2. 1 submit that the complainant namely Janmohammed Makvani has filed an F.I.R on 11.07.2018 with Wankaner city Police Station, Morbi

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/14861/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

being CR. no. I- 44 of 2018 against the applicants for the offenses under sections 307, 326, 325, 324, 354, 323, 427, 447, 504, 506(2), 143, 147, 148 and 149 of Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of Gujarat Police Act.

3. I say and submit that even I've not received any injuries permanent or serious in nature, under this circumstance, the case of the applicants deserves consideration in the interest of justice.

4. I say that the dispute amongst us came to amicably and peacefully and the on misconception of facts the F.I.R came to be filed for which now no grievance exists against each other. I say that as in fact F.I.R in question which is filed may not continue in view of resolutions of the dispute amongst us and therefore the prayer as prayed for may kindly be accepted in the facts and circumstances of the present case, under these set of circumstances, if the Hon'ble Court pleased to terminate the proceeding as prayed for by the applicants by quashing and setting aside the F.I.R being CR No. 1-44 of 2018 filed before Wankaner city Police Station, Morbi, Sessions Case No. 33 of 2019 pending before the Sessions Court, Morbi as well as further proceedings arising thereof, I've no objection.

5. I'm filing this affidavit on my free will and wish without there being any undue pressure."

10. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, as well as considering the facts and

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/14861/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

circumstances arising out of the present application and also taking into consideration the decisions rendered in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 31, Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC) and State of Haryana Vs. Bhajanlal reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, it appears that continuing further with the criminal proceedings in relation to the impugned FIR as well as the criminal case against the applicants-accused would be an unnecessary harassment to the applicants-accused. It further appears that the trial would be a futile exercise and further continuing with the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR as well as the criminal case would amount to abuse of process of law. Hence, to secure the ends of justice, the impugned FIR as well as the criminal case and all other consequential proceedings are required to be quashed and set aside in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 528 of the of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

11. In the result, the application is allowed. The First Information Report being C.R.No.I- 44 of 2018 registered with the Wankaner City Police Station, Morbi, for the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/14861/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/03/2026

undefined

offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 325, 324, 354, 323, 427, 447, 504, 506(2), 143, 147, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the G.P.Act, the Charge Sheet and Sessions Case No.33 of 2019 pending before the learned Sessions Court, Morbi as well as all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto, are hereby ordered to be quashed and set-aside.

12. Rule made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

(VIMAL K. VYAS, J)

DIPTI PATEL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter