[Cites 1, Cited by 0]
Gujarat High Court
Yasin Ibrahimbhai Jalani (Yasin ... vs State Of Gujarat on 12 March, 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/362/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
CHARGESHEET) NO. 362 of 2026
==========================================================
YASIN IBRAHIMBHAI JALANI (YASIN IBRAHIMBHAI JALALI FAKIR)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
VALIMOHAMMED PATHAN(6383) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. SOAHAM JOSHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
DESAI
Date : 12/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on
behalf of the respondent-State.
2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the
respondent-State.
3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the
applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.
11186009250008 of 2025 registered with Veraval Police Station,
Gir Somnath for the offence punishable under Sections 3(1)(ii),
3(2), and 3(4) of the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized
Crime Act, 2015.
4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/362/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026
undefined
considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of
the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular
bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed,
further incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the
Investigation Officer in any manner. Out of the total 14 accused
named in the FIR, 13 accused have been granted regular bail. It is
further contended that, the applicant is ready and willing to
abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court, if
released on bail.
5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor
appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to
the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking
to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present
applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may
not exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the
application may be dismissed.
6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are
considered:-
i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Gir Somnath
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/362/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026
undefined
district, hence would be available at the time of trial;
ii. The other 13 co-accused have already enlarged on bail by
the Co-ordinate Benches;
iii. The investigation is completed and charge-sheet has been
filed.
iv. No further recovery or discovery is to be effected from the
applicant.
7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v.
Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.
8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering
the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the
First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in
detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that, this is a fit
case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on
regular bail.
9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is
ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered
as C.R. No. 11186009250008 of 2025 registered with Veraval
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/362/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026
undefined
Police Station, Gir Somnath, on executing a bail bond of
Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety
of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and
subject to the conditions that he shall;
[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the
prosecution;
[c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court within a
week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an
affidavit to that effect;
[d] not to enter the local limits of Gir Somnath district for a
period of one year, except for attending the trial court and
marking presence before the concerned police station;
[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the I.O. and
to the Court at the time of execution of the bond along with
documentary proof and shall not change his residence without
prior intimation to the I.O. and the court;
[f] mark his presence on every Monday before the concerned
police station for a period of one year;
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/362/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026
undefined
[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for
which, he shall file an affidavit before the concerned court and
the police station.
10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not
required in connection with any other offence for the time being.
If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the
Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate
action in accordance with law.
11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned
Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions
in accordance with law.
12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be
influenced by any observations of this Court which are of
preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of
enlarging the applicant on regular bail. The application is
allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the
aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.
(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
ANIRUDH OJHA
