Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajput Hitendra Madhavsinh vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 51 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 51 Guj
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Rajput Hitendra Madhavsinh vs State Of Gujarat on 16 January, 2026

                                                                                                             NEUTRAL CITATION




                              R/SCR.A/632/2026                                ORDER DATED: 16/01/2026

                                                                                                             undefined




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO.
                                                 632 of 2026

                       ==========================================================
                                                  RAJPUT HITENDRA MADHAVSINH
                                                             Versus
                                                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR DAIVAT S BHATT(11162) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================

                            CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

                                                          Date : 16/01/2026

                                                           ORAL ORDER

1. Present application is preferred by the Petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of the order dated 18.10.2025 passed by the 27 th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad in Criminal Case No.51667 of 2022.

2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent - State.

3. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondent - State.

4. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they are now not willing to proceed with the complaint any further.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/632/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2026

undefined

5. Leaned Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 2 (Original Complainant), who is present before this Court, has placed on record duly sworn in Affidavit dated 06.01.2026. The same is ordered to be taken on record. Learned Advocate has submitted that matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the complainant - Piyush Jashwantbhai Patel, who is present before the Court, has no objection, if present application is allowed. The affidavit reads thus:

"I, Piyush Jashvantbhai Patel, age: 39 Years, Male, Hindu, Occupation: Business, having address at. J 325, Sumel Business Park-6, Nr. Hanumanpura BRTS, Shahibaug, Ahmedabad that, 380004, solemnly affirm and state on oath

1. That, I am the Original Complainant in connection with the Criminal Case No. 51667/2022, filed against the present Petitioner, before the 27th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ahmedabad City. I further say that all the issues between the parties above mentioned are amicably settled and resolved peacefully out of the court.

2. I say that I have gone through with this memo of Petition and I am fully conversant with the facts and circumstances of this case and therefore I am duly competent to execute this affidavit. At the outset, I say that the facts stated in the memo of Petition are not disputed by me.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/SCR.A/632/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2026

undefined

3. It is summited that, on Dt.29.12.2025, the settlement agreement has been signed by the both the partiesmentioned above and the entire cheque amount has been paid to me by the Petitioner. Hence, I do not wish to proceed further and is willing to compound the offence.

4. In the facts and circumstances as narrated above, I on my free will, wish and desire stating on oath that I do not wish to prosecute the criminal proceedings with the Petitioner as the dispute and differences between us have been amicably settled and resolved peacefully. I state that this Special Criminal Application for quashing the impugned Judgment and Order dated 18.10.2025, passed in Criminal Case No. 51667 / 2022 be allowed in the interest of justice.

What is stated hereinabove is true to the best of my personal knowledge, information and belief and I believe the same to be true and correct."

6. Considering averments made in the Affidavit as also the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the respective parties, the present Application deserves to be allowed and is hereby allowed. The order dated 18.10.2025 passed by the 27 th Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad in Criminal Case No.51667 of 2022 is hereby quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute.

(M. R. MENGDEY,J) NABILA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter