Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 130 Guj
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2026
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/16617/2024 ORDER DATED: 19/01/2026
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
16617 of 2024
In F/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/31202/2024
In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL/31203/2024
With
F/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 31202 of 2024
In
F/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 31203 of 2024
==========================================================
LILABEN GANESHBHAI PATELIYA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ANVESH V VYAS(5654) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. HEMANG K SONI(15634) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR YUVRAJ D BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 19/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. This application for condonation of delay of 501
days and the Criminal Misc. Application are filed under
Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
("Code or CrPC") by the Complainant seeking leave to appeal
to challenge the judgment and order impugned passed by the
learned trial Court, whereby the Ld. Trial Court had
acquitted the Respondent/s-Accused of charge under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter
referred to as the `NI Act' for short).
2. Learned advocate for the appellant seeks
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/16617/2024 ORDER DATED: 19/01/2026
undefined
permission to withdraw the applications, in view of the latest
decision rendered by this Court in the case of Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki V/s State of Gujarat & Anr. being
Criminal Miscellaneous Application Nos. 12753 of 2019 with 12908 of 2019 on 23.12.2025, wherein, after considering the various judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, more
particularly, the judgment in the matter of M/s Celestium
Financial V/s A.Gyanasekaran etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804, has observed and held that the Complainant, in a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, being a Victim,
has a specific right to appeal under proviso of Section 372 of
the Code (Section 413 of BNSS) to the Court which is
immediately superior in hierarchy i.e., the Sessions Court,
with a liberty to file appropriate appeal under Section 372 of
the Code (Section 413 of BNSS) and prayed that the period that may be consumed in filing the present appeal, may not
be counted as delay in filing such appeal before the
concerned Court.
3. Permission as prayed for is granted. The
applications as well as the connected appeal are disposed of
as withdrawn, with a liberty to file appropriate appeal/s
before the concerned Court, within a period of four months
from the date of this order. Record and proceedings, if lying
with this Court, be remitted back to the concerned Court
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/16617/2024 ORDER DATED: 19/01/2026
undefined
forthwith.
4. It is clarified that the period that may be
consumed in filing the present appeal may not be counted as
delay in filing such appeal before the concerned Court.
Moreover, the certified copy of the impugned judgment, be
handed over to the applicant/appellant, as per Rules, if asked
for. It is open for the parties to agitate all the grievance
before the concerned Court afresh.
5. Considering that the matter has been pending for
considerable time, the learned lower Appellate Court is
required to make endeavour to dispose of the matter, if so
filed, as expeditiously as possible. It is clarified that this
Court has not gone into the merits of the matter at this stage.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J) URIL RANA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!