Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kehraram Harkharam Sevar (Chaudhari) vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2042 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2042 Guj
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Kehraram Harkharam Sevar (Chaudhari) vs State Of Gujarat on 7 April, 2026

                                                                                                        NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/7898/2026                              ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

                                                                                                         undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                             R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                         CHARGESHEET) NO. 7898 of 2026

                       ==========================================================
                                       KEHRARAM HARKHARAM SEVAR (CHAUDHARI)
                                                       Versus
                                                 STATE OF GUJARAT
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       KAMALKUMAR R SHARMA(9502) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       O I PATHAN(7684) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MS. JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                       Date : 07/04/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned APP appearing on behalf of the

respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the

respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the

applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.

11189006260039 of 2026 registered with Tankara Police Station,

Morbi for the offence punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 81,

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7898/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

98(2) and 116(b) of the Prohibition Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that,

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of

the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular

bail. It is further submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed,

further incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the

Investigation Officer in any manner. Learned advocate for the

applicant has submitted that, the applicant shall not leave the

State of Gujarat till the trial is over.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing for the respondent - State has vehemently objected to

the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking

to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present

applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may

not exercise discretion in favour of the applicant and the

application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the

respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are

considered:-

i. The applicant though is a permanent resident of

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7898/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

Rajasthan, he shall not leave the State of Gujarat, hence

would be available at the time of trial;

ii. The applicant has three antecedents of identical nature

however, in one of the offences, he came to be acquitted

by the concerned court.

iii. The investigation has been over and charge-sheet has been

filed before the concerned competent court.

iv. The apprehension of the learned APP, as regards the non-

availability of the applicant during the trial can be put to

rest by imposing stringent condition.

v. As per the prosecution case, the applicant was the driver of

the truck trailer no. RJ-01-GB-5019, wherein the illicit

liquor consignment was transported and that, he was

neither the owner nor the receiver of the said contraband.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down

by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v.

Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7898/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering

the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the

First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in

detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit

case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on

regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is

ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered

as C.R. No. 11189006260039 of 2026 registered with Tankara

Police Station, Morbi, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one local surety of

the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject

to the conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a

week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall file an

affidavit to that effect;

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7898/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

[d] not leave the geographical limits of State of Gujarat

without prior permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence in Gujarat to

the I.O. and the Court at the time of execution of the bond

along with documentary proof and shall not change his

residence without prior intimation to the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark his presence alternate day before the concerned

police station for a period of three months, and thereafter, on

every Monday till the trial is over.

[g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter, for

which, he shall file affidavits before the concerned court and

the police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not

required in connection with any other offence for the time being.

If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the

Sessions Court concerned will be at liberty to take appropriate

action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court having

jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned

Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/7898/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the purpose of

enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is

made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is

permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANIRUDH OJHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter