Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dhruv Jivrajbhai Chavda vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 2024 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2024 Guj
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Dhruv Jivrajbhai Chavda vs State Of Gujarat on 7 April, 2026

                                                                                                                NEUTRAL CITATION




                             R/CR.MA/6960/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

                                                                                                                 undefined




                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                             R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                         CHARGESHEET) NO. 6960 of 2026

                       ==========================================================
                                                     DHRUV JIVRAJBHAI CHAVDA
                                                              Versus
                                                     STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       DARSHANKUMAR R PATEL(9406) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR DARSHANKUMAR P VEGAD(11612) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MS.JALPABEN V. VANALIYA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                       MS.JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================

                          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                                DESAI

                                                         Date : 07/04/2026

                                                          ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being Part-A C.R. No.

11210004260020 of 2026 registered with Amroli Police

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6960/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

Station, Surat City, for the offence punishable under

Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya

Sanhita, 2023 and under the provisions of Sections 3 and

4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act,

2012.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit

that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, who

is aged 20 year and nature of the allegation levelled, the

applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further

submitted that, since the charge-sheet is filed, further

incarceration of the applicant will not benefit the

Investigation Officer in any manner. It is further

contended that, the applicant is ready and willing to

abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this

Court, if released on bail. Learned advocate upon

instructions submits that the applicant will remain within

the State of Gujarat during the trial.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6960/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming

out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise

discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. The original complainant Sonalben is present before

this Court who has tendered an affidavit-in-reply. The

same is taken on record, wherein, she has submitted

that because of some misunderstanding, the FIR came

to be lodged by her, however, now, she has no

grievance against the petitioner, and that in the heat of

moment, the FIR came to be lodged by her.

ii. The applicant is a permanent resident of

District:Bhavnagar, hence, would be available at the

time of trial.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6960/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

iii. The applicant does not have any criminal

antecedent.

iv. There was romantic relationship between the

applicant aged 20 years and the victim aged 16 years

and 3 months.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The

applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection

with FIR being Part-A C.R. No. 11210004260020 of 2026

registered with Amroli Police Station, Surat City, on

executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6960/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

Thousand only) with one local surety of the like amount to

the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the

conditions that he shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within

a week, and if he does not possess a passport, he shall

file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior

permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of

the bond along with documentary proof and shall not

change his residence without prior intimation to the

I.O. and the court;

9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/6960/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/04/2026

undefined

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Court concerned will be at liberty to take

appropriate action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the competent Court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the competent Court shall not

be influenced by any observations of this Court which are

of preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct

service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANKIT SHAH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter