Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jigneshkumar Ramanbhai Parmar vs Vipulkumar Ramanbhai Makvana
2024 Latest Caselaw 704 Guj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 704 Guj
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2024

Gujarat High Court

Jigneshkumar Ramanbhai Parmar vs Vipulkumar Ramanbhai Makvana on 25 January, 2024

                                                                                  NEUTRAL CITATION




     R/CR.MA/10460/2023                              ORDER DATED: 25/01/2024

                                                                                   undefined




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 10460
                           of 2023
            In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1383 of 2023
                            With
              R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1383 of 2023
==========================================================
                      JIGNESHKUMAR RAMANBHAI PARMAR
                                   Versus
                       VIPULKUMAR RAMANBHAI MAKVANA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ANIK E SHAIKH(10873) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
JAGAT V PATEL(7480) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MS MONALI BHATT APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER

                              Date : 25/01/2024

                               ORAL ORDER

ORDER IN CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION:

1. This is an application by the applicant - original complainant under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking leave of this Court to present an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal, passed by the learned 3 rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadiad dated 21.04.2023 in Criminal Case No.1648 of 2020.

2. Heard learned advocate appearing for the applicant - original complainant and perused the impugned judgment and order of the trial Court.

3. Learned advocate submits that it is the case of the complainant that the complainant came into contact with the respondent - accused through Pareshbhai Dhanjibhai Parmar, who is

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10460/2023 ORDER DATED: 25/01/2024

undefined

the brother-in-law of the respondent - accused. It was conveyed by said Pareshbhai that the respondent - accused is doing the business of share market and if the amount would be invested, then the complainant would get the huge return. Under the said trust, the amount of Rs.3,50,000/- was invested and after making payment of the interest for two months, payment was stopped. Notice was issued on 17.10.2019 which was produced below Exh.26 and on issuance of the notice, the respondent - accused had paid some amount and thereafter, the impugned cheque was issued for the amount of Rs.2 lacs on 10.08.2020. The learned advocate further submits that the judgment and order of the learned trial Court was passed on the ground that the part payment was made by the respondent - accused in January, 2020 and, therefore, the amount which is mentioned in the cheque is not legally enforceable debt towards the complainant. The learned advocate submits that from the beginning, the case of the complainant is that for two months, interest was paid and thereafter, it was stopped, therefore, the notice Exh.26 was issued. The learned advocate submits that the learned trial Court erred in considering the said payment towards the part payment as admittedly, that amount was paid in the month of January, 2020 and the cheque was issued in the month of August, 2020. The learned advocate submits that though the learned trial Court concluded that during recording of the statement under Section 313, neither issuance of the cheque was disputed nor the signature was disputed however, the learned trial Court concluded the trial in favour of the respondent - accused by holding that the respondent - accused had successfully rebutted the presumption which is in favour of the complainant. The learned advocate submits that there was no any part payment towards the disputed cheque, therefore, the learned trial Court erred in arriving at conclusion on facts.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/10460/2023 ORDER DATED: 25/01/2024

undefined

4. Considering the avernments made in the application and submissions made by the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, this Court finds that there is some arguable case in favour of the applicant, therefore, leave, as prayed for, is granted. This application is allowed.

ORDER IN CRIMINAL APPEAL:

1. The appeal is admitted. Learned APP waives service of notice of admission on behalf of respondent - State. Learned advocate Mr.Pratik Advani waives service of notice of admission on behalf of the respondent - accused.

2. Record and proceedings be called for from the concerned court. Registry is directed to list the Criminal Appeal in seriatim.

(M. K. THAKKER,J) Hitesh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter